Mirrors don't do a thing except reflect. Using mirrors is a poor analogy anyway because the image is turned upside down by the eye looking at the mirror.
Thought is objective... it may not produce objective results but that's in a different arena is it not? Would it not be true to say that it would be objective in the context of the internal world regardless of if it is in the external world. Ergo concept would be objective at least initially.
Oh and those numbers... a component is one a dichotomy is one... so the component which must by nature consist of elements of both sides of the dichotomy also equals one? If only such were believable.
The image does not turn. This is what you said.
The eye turns the image?
It looks like it.
The eye does not turn anything.
Look is not objective.
Definantly these are some coherent definitions from linguists. The one that catches my eye though, objectivity=shared subjectivity, it sounds an adequate definition in most situations, but it can prove questionable. For example Galileo, believed the earth was round, if we take this definition of objectivity, the Earth was flat. Galileo was being subjective.
To take CaptainChick's quote. A lie is a lie even if everyone believes it. The truth is the truth even if nobody believes it." - David Stevens. (Great quote btw )
Shared subjectivity couldnít change the fact the Earth is round, so if objectivity is the closest thing to truth, this perspective is contradicted by factual scientific observation. So who is really objective here? Its an interesting question, if we take the position that objectivity is shared subjectivity then that means subjectivity doesnít have to be emotion filled, it is logical, in certain variables.
So: truth <> (unequals) objectivity (nor shared subjectivity).
Woudl it be true to say that thought is objective but the conclusions it draws are not?
Thoughts (including the conclusions) are always translations and interpretations (Except, or less so, when you go automatic writing). First there is the specific language you use. It's an interpretation of information that we sense in some way. There is no language 'out there', not like there are trees (or there is, in an uninterpreted way).
It seems to me this thread is moving towards a conclusion I made a while ago. My conclusion was that few areas,such as maths, can have true objectivity applied to them. For most areas in this illogical world we require a sort of all-encompassing subjectivity, and, importantly, an understanding of its subjective nature.
The world is like a piece of art, if you are unwilling to be subjective you will never appreciate or understand the entire painting.
So maybe thought isn't objective because someone who thought entirely objectively would be unable to understand our world.
Hell, maybe this is why some NTs are so depressed.
And what "objective, the one where your thinking is unclouded by personal bias or the one where you think things that really are true?
Somebody read Wittgenstein's Private Language argument and report back. I think it goes: if the language inside my head were truly private--that's to say, created by me and me alone, without at least some objective reference to something genuinely "shared" by other persons--aka "subjective"--then it will be private even from me too. Which is to say, a private language is impossible. Without an independent, perceivable, identifiable object of some kind, there is logically no basis for identifying the meaning of any of the terms of the language. You won't be able to tell yourself what words mean. Something like that.
Next, you have to assume that God didn't fill up your head with a bunch of meanings and set you loose to roam around inside your apparent head with your supposed body and a bunch of other seeming people. Because he could have done that, and really you're just a Matrix-blob in an isolation tank. But you know what? If that's the way it worked, if some outside agency plugged a bunch of subjective facts into your head and made you dream a reality, then there is still something out there...