I guess my type can't be the least idiosyncratic, but I'd guess it's near. I'm not sure. (I've another thread where I contradict myself; I'm not sure, which is why I ask. I guess it's complicated. I feel like being easily odd as well as usual.)
Which types seem the least idiosyncratic to you?
I'd guess EJs, with Ts and Ss less idiosyncratic than Fs and Ns.
Looking back, I see how I've given in to insisting people to understand what I know for true; rather, I've conformed for the most part, meeting the society's expectations for usual things. Has it been because of age or recovery from burnout, enabling me to participate more in the society? Before, I found much joy in confusing the people and doing things the odd way. I still do things my own way, but I divert attention away from my nonstandard way of doing things. I guess it's practicality, considering the numbers of average people around us.
I'm thinking how this conformity corresponds to my altered cognitive function usage.
I'm hypothesizing it's much because of increased use of Te and Se. Te looks for what works; if some some practice is distasteful to me on theoretical grounds, but I find it inefficient to fight against it, I just might go along with it. I provide an easy interface for people, something they can understand, rather than be the complex person I would be in my natural style.
I'm not sure what has lead the change; altered cognitive function usage (return to my pre-burnout condition), or age.
Se gets me to notice everything that is. Someone has feelings. There's money in my pocket. Train leaves at 5:12pm. I guess my (per MBTI, theoretically tertiary) Se helps me to observe what is, as opposed to saying "they shouldn't be".. which I guess is a Fi/Ti function usage.
I guess Ni gives me a focused intuitive, personal view to serve my practical Te processes.
All of this might explain why I don't practice many idiosyncratic traits anymore. Then again, my subjective, continuous, personal and intuitive process Ni maintains that I'd be quite odd, idiosyncratic man should I not provide the "easy-to-use" interface, "compatibility mode" or "real-world interaction mode" of Te and Se.