|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 (permalink) | |
|
.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 3,062
![]() |
Quote:
Type 5 is supressive/avoiding. Type 9 is controlling/avoiding. Both can be obsessed with making sense of their world, but for slightly different reasons. If your order is correct, you should probably be closer to 9 than 5, because "controlling" is your dominant value in the emotion variable, not supressing. If you stay in conrolling in that variable and go from pursuing to avoiding in the other, you go from 7 to 9. That's all our system does. I guess it's possible to go entirely from one mode to the other (switch two variables at the same time), but it would seem to be less likely. I guess that's a potential downside to the system. (Remember, we have redefined the types as literally just the intersection of the two variables. So all excess data on types would be talking about emergent properties, not necessary ones.)
__________________
INTP 9 sx/sp (9>5>2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 (permalink) |
|
.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 3,062
![]() |
Emotion variable:
Turbulent -- emotions take hold; emotional reactions are valid by default. Suppressing -- emotions get in the way, they should be pushed aside as much as possible. Controlling -- sort of a midpoint between the two -- emotions are a reality, and need to be thought through and sorted out before choosing how to act on them.
__________________
INTP 9 sx/sp (9>5>2) |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) |
|
Closet ENTJ
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ENTP
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,471
![]() |
Yeah okay, like you say it's a limitation to the system because that's just what I did, switch entirely. So says the shrink too
![]() I definitely was suppressive, and turned controlling. Ha, that sounds bad taken out of context hahaha..
__________________
Ils se démerdent, les mecs: trop bon, trop con..................................MY BLOG! And even though it all went wrong, I'll stand before the Lord of Song With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
Liasion man in Amsterdam
Join Date: Apr 2008
Type: entq
Location: Bochum, Germany
Posts: 5,205
![]() |
I just did your test with my girlfriend and she gave me a completly different Point of View of myself that I still need to grasp. Wanted you to ask, if this combination could work:
Me: Core Type: Avoiding / Suppressive = 5 1st Wing: Avoiding / Turbulent = 4 2nd Wing: Anticipating/Suppressive = 1 (uff completly new point of myself o0 )My girlfriend: Core Type: Anticipating / Turbulent = 6 1st Wing: Anticipating / Controlled = 2 2nd Wing: Pursuing / Turbulent = 8 --- Have to think about this but my girlfriend could have made a point here. She is pretty much INFJ and good at those things, as you folks are. Just wanted to ask here, if the above combinations work, according to theory
__________________
pocket estj Enneagram: 3w4 "Now is the dramatic moment of fate, Watson, when you hear a step upon the stair which is walking into your life, and you know not whether for good or ill." ~Sir Arthur Conan Doyle [Mind.in.a.Box] ------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Type: INFP
Posts: 89
![]() |
If the descriptions are very short, words can be misleading. All enneagram types are avoiding in a certain way, but here the word “avoiding” is used to communicate a specific concept. Your girlfriend can give you a valuable new point of view if she tells you why and in what way she perceives you as avoiding, but could nonetheless be wrong about your e-type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) |
|
Liasion man in Amsterdam
Join Date: Apr 2008
Type: entq
Location: Bochum, Germany
Posts: 5,205
![]() |
I understand, what you mean. She has no clue of MBTI or Enneagram or whatsoever. So we just did a "what word fits best" based analysis.
I was surprised though that she gave me the avoiding tag in my behaviour but I am beginning to understand her PoV. I just did continue the thought and wanted to know, if according to the theory of the Enneagram presented here, the above types can fit.
__________________
pocket estj Enneagram: 3w4 "Now is the dramatic moment of fate, Watson, when you hear a step upon the stair which is walking into your life, and you know not whether for good or ill." ~Sir Arthur Conan Doyle [Mind.in.a.Box] ------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) |
|
^ He pronks, too!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In my sleep.
Posts: 4,276
![]() |
God damn it. It figures that activity in this topic would pick up as soon as I'd have limited internet access... Where to start, where to start...
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana. ![]() _________________________________ INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. http://www.typologycentral.com/forum...onge-evan.html Please do answer these. I'm curious. MP's Johari window MP's Nohari window |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) |
|
^ He pronks, too!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In my sleep.
Posts: 4,276
![]() |
The second variable is in reference to a person's most default mood, or means of emotional management. The turbulent type lets emotions run wild. The suppressive type tries to cut them out. The controlling type tries to pick and choose which it best likes to express.
You should identify with all of them to an extent, because you should possess all of those qualities. The question is which method of approaching your emotions do you default to.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana. ![]() _________________________________ INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. http://www.typologycentral.com/forum...onge-evan.html Please do answer these. I'm curious. MP's Johari window MP's Nohari window |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 (permalink) |
|
^ He pronks, too!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In my sleep.
Posts: 4,276
![]() |
I'm still open to change on a number of factors. For instance, at the moment, we state that you are more likely to drop two on one variable and stay the same on one, then you are to drop one on both variables. Now, that was my conjecture, but I'm not certain that it is true.
So, for instance, it may be more likely that I would become a 2 or 3 than a 4, or maybe more likely that I'd become a 4 than a 2 or a 3. I'm still not positive on this yet. Either way, you are more likely to drop down on only one than to drop down on both at the same time.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana. ![]() _________________________________ INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. http://www.typologycentral.com/forum...onge-evan.html Please do answer these. I'm curious. MP's Johari window MP's Nohari window |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) | |
|
^ He pronks, too!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In my sleep.
Posts: 4,276
![]() |
Quote:
All of that is fascinating and everything, but I think it is a decidedly different topic.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana. ![]() _________________________________ INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. http://www.typologycentral.com/forum...onge-evan.html Please do answer these. I'm curious. MP's Johari window MP's Nohari window |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/mbti-tm-enneagram-other-personality-matrices/8520-new-improved-enneagram-sponge-evan.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| New Way of Viewing the Enneagram? - INTP Central | This thread | Refback | 10-01-2008 04:09 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|