|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Allura red
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type:
Location: storming castles
Posts: 3,046
![]() |
With Dana's permission, I'm posting a PM conversation we had:
Quote:
What do people think? |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Order Now!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Type: ESFJ
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 4,598
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Who wants to try a bottle of merc's "Extroversion Olive Oil?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Skilled
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INFJ
Location: Southeast City
Posts: 4,480
![]() |
Are you asking if we think that people are taught to fit in a mold that the culture expects them to?
I don't know. Maybe I'm projecting my own expierences with this onto your question, but yeah sadly I do believe that a your certain cultures do expect you to act a certain type. I also believe that if you are a certain type you wouldn't be able to fake being a certian type for long no matter who it was for. You are who you are. Most black people are ISTJ? I'm a black, male, INFJ, I'm almost the complete opposite of what I'm expected to be.
__________________
My own Mogulus Nostalgia channel |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Procrastinating
Join Date: Feb 2008
Type: INTP
Posts: 1,061
![]() |
I'm first generation born in with USA with Irish heritage. They're known for being fairly outspoken and calling "a spade, a spade" and I do think my cultural environment growing up has affected me in that regard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||
|
Highly Hollow
Join Date: Dec 2007
Type: INFJ
Location: Slovenia (but I'm French)
Posts: 868
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
*** Oh, and Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Full Circle
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ENTP
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 8,534
![]() |
I don't 100 percent know where you're getting at here, but yes, there is definitely cultural bias with the MBTI just like any other form of psychometrics -- IQ testing for example. Particularly troubling for me is how there is a literal vs. figurative dichotomy in the MBTI. I think too many people emphasize the sociological definition of "literal" instead of the more psychological definition. For example, an American says "You're biting my head off" as a way of saying "overreacting." Now I suspect that a person unfamiliar with American or English-language euphemisms would take that phrase literally due to misunderstandings.
I think the definition of "literal" vs. "figurative" should be worded in a more psychological way. In interpreting the euphemisms of different cultures, chances are that, yes, I'm going to take it literal. However, from a more internal psychological point of view, I tend to be more figurative about the world as a whole. For example, when I look at something, I prefer to take it figuratively in that I prefer looking at how it will stimulate my mind and imagine all sorts of possibilities based upon what I observe. I prefer doing this to seeing the object for what it is. I focus more on what it means, but in the subjective context...what it means to me and what imaginary possibilities the object could suggest unrelated to the external world. I don't take the world literally. I think when the question is worded "Are you inclined to take someone's words literally or figuratively?", I feel that it's such a narrow definition of literal. And so I think it should be a more universal definition of literal.
__________________
"Place quotes in your signature to appear profound."
--Uberfuhrer |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
shameless hussy
Join Date: Oct 2007
Type: entp
Location: wherever
Posts: 7,620
![]() |
I come from a culture traditionally described as "white trash"
This culture is quite different from the mainstream white culture.I think I complained in my blog once that this is a culture where, if you don't do something with your hands and see what is around you for just that, you are considered lazy and a bit off- my ability to schmooze and convince people of things is even looked askance at because it's not MAKING something- it's considered dishonest work ![]() To get out of my background culture as an N would probably be nearly impossible |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
AWOL
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INFj
Location: depressed midwest
Posts: 4,930
![]() |
Quote:
Unbelievable. ![]() (sorry if this is off-topic)
__________________
This is one of the miracles of love: It gives a power of seeing through its own enchantments and yet not being disenchanted. ~C. S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Full Circle
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ENTP
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 8,534
![]() |
Okay, I read the first post again. It seems there was a few things I just misunderstood. Even though I am white, I don't think I've ever been perceived as an introvert in a typical white American social group. In fact, my behavior in front of other people is quite animated and I am able be wild and goofy in contrast of the typical stereotype of a serious INTJ.
I also wouldn't be perceived as hardworking in the way American culture defines it, and what most people associate with a J. Hell, my physical surroundings are, for the most part, not even organized or in any kind of order and much of my lifestyle is physically untidy, in general. However, cognitively, I am a J much more than a P. I want my lifestyle to be predictable and controlled. I don't like unsuspected surprises. In addition, I can be extremely ambitious when there is something that interests me. But I'm just not interested in "American dream" types of things, so to the American culture, I am not hardworking and would likely be perceived as a slacker. Usually, when I take an MBTI, I mentally think of the questions as if they are being asked from a more universal and less ethnocentric perspective.
__________________
"Place quotes in your signature to appear profound."
--Uberfuhrer |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Closet ENTJ
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ENTP
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,470
![]() |
Quote:
What I mean is that whilst doing Thing A in one country might have you perceived as one thing, it might have you perceived as an entirely different thing in another country. So people with the same mentalities and personal takes on the world might present it differently, depending on the 'audience' they've been trained to present to. I think the reason many people might find the whole theory of MBTI a crock of shit is because it's all presented from a very particular point of view - the home culture of its authors which happens to be sorta middle majority white America. It doesn't necessarily mean that the theory doesn't hold true for other cultures, it just means that new profiles are needed that take these differences into account and offer/allow for different ways of displaying the same qualities.
__________________
Ils se démerdent, les mecs: trop bon, trop con..................................MY BLOG! And even though it all went wrong, I'll stand before the Lord of Song With nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Birth Order & IQ Differences | Jennifer | Science, Technology, and Future Tech | 30 | 01-28-2009 12:16 AM |
| Gender Differences | wildcat | MBTI (tm), Enneagram, and other personality matrices | 42 | 10-11-2008 09:04 PM |
| S/N differences in reading | prplchknz | Other Psychology Topics | 16 | 01-26-2008 07:04 PM |
| Differences in type descriptions | Maverick | MBTI (tm), Enneagram, and other personality matrices | 12 | 05-28-2007 09:04 PM |