User Tag List

123 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 21

  1. #1
    Honor Thy Inferior Such Irony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    INtp
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    5,091

    Default Syn flow and contra flow instincts

    Do you think the syn-flow vs. contra-flow theory is valid? Do you see it applying to your stacking?





    Source: Socionics - the16types.info - Instinctual Stackings

    Flow of Instinctual Energies & Compatibility

    When we invest our energy, most of it is devoted to fulfillment of our primary instinct. The remaining energy radiates or flows onto the secondary instinct and finally onto the last instinct, which receives the smallest share. There are two possible configurations or directions for this flow. In first configuration, energy is invested in the order of sx→sp→so→sx. This direction gives rise to three stackings: sx/sp, sp/so, so/sx. In the second configuration, energy is invested in the order of sx→so→sp→sx, which gives rise to the other three stackings: sx/so, so/sp and sp/sx.

    Syn-flow: sp → so → sx → sp
    Stackings involved: sp/so → so/sx → sx/sp → sp/so
    Direction: Compelled toward people. Acting upon and with others as a born insider i.e.- deeply human.

    Contra-flow: sp → sx → so → sp
    Stackings involved: sp/sx → sx/so → so/sp → sp/sx
    Direction: Compelled against people. Seething belligerent outsiders; 'antisocial', provoking, reverse-flow change catalysts. In some profound sense, rejecting the human condition, their own and/or that of others.

    The two flows move in the opposite directions. This antithesis can be seen if the instinctual stackings are compared in pairs:

    so/sx - including, associating, affiliating, networking, incorporating, interconnecting, introducing, unifying, linking, bonding, annexing, cooperating, receiving
    sx/so - excluding, eliminating, dividing, separating, contradicting, subverting, confronting, rebuffing, ridiculing, challenging, interrupting, reforming, rupturing

    sx/sp - intensifying, escalating, rising, surging, enlivening, invigorating, accelerating, stimulating, energizing, vitalizing, reviving, animating, inspiriting
    sp/sx - dulling, calming, quieting, grounding, descending, lowering, dampening, numbing, desensitizing, exhausting, deadening, extinguishing, making still

    sp/so - conserving, protecting, maintaining, preserving, supplying, repairing, sustaining, stewarding
    so/sp - utilizing, employing, implementing, expending, exercising, spending, capitalizing, expropriating


    It has been proposed that people of stackings that are part of same flow progression generally have mutually reinforcing and supportive interactions as they are channeling their attention, efforts and energies in the same direction. The stacking located upstream within the flow progression has the ability to cover for the blindspot instinct of the downstream stacking, by this also reinforcing the energy flow of downstream stacking. For example: a person of sx/sp stacking is directing energy in the following manner sx→sp→so, in which case someone with sp/so stack can reinforce the sx/sp's weaker secondary sp→so link and support their social-last blindspot.

    The relationship between people of downsteam and upstream stackings within the same flow can be compared to relations of Benefit or Supervision in Socionics i.e. they contain elements of asymmetry; partners seem to one another simultaneously talented in some way and also somehow lacking.

    The person of downstream stacking usually feels a measure of attraction for a person of their upstream stacking; feeling drawn towards them, they may attempt to become acquainted. In they become close, the downstream stacking person may attempt to provide for the upstream stacking person by help and activities channeled through their secondary instinct (e.g. so/sx may try to draw out sx/sp out of their shell into the social sphere, invite them to partake in some social activities, introduce them to new people, sensing that sx/sp is too insular). The downstream stacking person at the same time feels some kind of deficiency in the individual of the upstream stacking. This is reflected, first of all, in inflexible and overly emphatic focus on their first instinct, which for downstream stacking is an adaptive, flexible, creative area only of secondary importance; and secondly, the deficiency is felt in lack of attention to their primary instinct (e.g. sx/sp may feel that sp/so doesn't know how to creatively provide for their sp-needs and that sp/so is not as emotionally responsive or immersed). The upstream person, meanwhile, comes into awareness of downstream stacking's deficiency in their blindspot instinct which for upstream stacking serves as a creative area. If their relations are friendly, the upstream person will attempt to provide for the blindspot of the downstream person, guiding them away from committing mistakes and towards beneficial and constructive actions in this sphere (e.g. sx/sp will try to guide so/sx away from doing anything that may threaten their self-preservation needs, their well-being, health, and livelihood, and direct them towards ensuring greater degree of sustainability, practicality, and well-being in their lives). The downstream person may be reluctant to accept such help, since this is not something that they generally concern about, but at the same time sense that it is supportive and reinforcing of their lifestyle, since it helps them to deal with their blindspot issues. Such help may also feel invigorating, inspiring, and uplifting, since influence exerted on one's blindspot instinct has the effect of alleviating the neuroses and insecurities related to the fixations of the primary instinct. However, if these people are on unfriendly terms, the upstream stacking person may be openly critical and derisive of the weaknesses of downstream person in their blindspot areas, and look down on the downstream person for what they see as misguided and deficient orientation.

    Relations between stackings of opposite flows may feel attractive initially due to their novelty and contrast. However, in the long run, the interaction may feel somewhat boring, unrewarding, uncomplimentary, disorienting, correcting, stifling, and otherwise frustrating to the people involved.

    Interaction between opposite flow stackings that share the dominant instinct (e.g. sp/so-sp/sx, sx/sp-sx/so) are usually attractive, interesting and compelling; such pairings are frequently encountered. Both partners share the same primary drive and orientation, which evokes mutual sympathy and respect. However, eventually they discover that they tap into different spheres to try to fulfill their primary need due to having different secondary instincts. At this point, each may attempt to pull the other into the realm of their secondary instinct, but find that while the other person appreciates this invitation in at least for its novelty, their partner doesn't feel comfortable within this sphere and will withdraw. This can lead to disagreement, loss of interest in one another, and even mutual reproaches (e.g. sx/so may complain that sx/sp is too socially unaware and unrefined, while sx/sp will find fault with what they see as sx/so's social vassalage and disregard for their privacy). It is as if both partners have similar strivings and end goals, but end up pulling it into different directions to reach them, which brings about friction and over time loss of interest in one another. Nevertheless, among the opposite flow matches, this pairing is often the most attractive and frequently encountered one.

    Opposite flow stackings that share both instincts (e.g. sp/so and so/sp) often have overlapping areas of interests, concerns, and desires, and same area of disinterest and disregard (same instinctual blindspot). They may appreciate what the other person brings into relationship in terms of content, feel camaraderie with one another on basis of sharing the blindspot instinct (e.g. sp/sx and sx/sp may appreciate each other's disregard for the social convention and "lone wolf" attitude). However, partners feel somehow elusive to one another: what constitutes the primary drive, desire, and concern of one partner, the other approaches in a creative, flexible, lighthearted way as something that is only of secondary interest and importance. Thus, while inverse stackings can sense some kind of similarity, they manage to constantly unbalance and throw each other off by displaying an impudent attitude toward the area that the other considers to be "sacred" and not to be played around with. Since these stackings are channeling their attention and energies in the opposite directions, they may enter a cycle of mutual reorientation, correction, extinguishment, and criticize the other for what they see as a misguided focus, not being able to take the other's primary instinctual value in a serious manner. Both of them might feel as if they are constantly pulling the rug from under each other's feet.

    Stackings that share the same middle instinct but not the leading one can be said to be most opposite in their orientation. If there is any attraction between people of these stackings, it usually forms on basis of overlap of their middle instinct (e.g. sx/sp and so/sp may have involving discussion about sp-topics). They soon discover, however, that their primary motivations and desires couldn't be any more different, that they do not truly understand each other's orientation and primary desires. Feeling that it is difficult to bridge the distance, they often part ways. Often it happens that one of them finds that the primary orientation of the other is too disruptive to their own world (e.g. so/sp feels like sx/sp is too sharp and socially unrefined in self-expression). In such worst case scenarios, one of the people involved may try to eliminate or somehow suppress the other person. This pairing holds the most potential for misunderstandings and conflicts of all other stacking combinations.
    INtp
    5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
    Ravenclaw/Hufflepuff
    Neutral Good
    LII-Ne




  2. #2
    Honor Thy Inferior Such Irony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    INtp
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    5,091

    Default

    I've always been torn between sp/so and so/sp stackings for myself. I do see myself as somewhat more syn-flow than contra-flow and I tend to get along better with the syn flow stackings.

    I don't know yet how valid this theory is but it does give something interesting to think about.
    INtp
    5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
    Ravenclaw/Hufflepuff
    Neutral Good
    LII-Ne




  3. #3
    Member brainheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    37

    Default

    I am definitely syn-flow. I've noticed my instincts operate like the Fauvre's concept of tritype, in that if my dominant orientation isn't working I will shift to the next strongest. I very much follow a pattern of sx-sp-so. I don't know if this applies to others, but it seems to be how I work.
    459

  4. #4

    Default

    That theory was first introduced at enneasite.com:

    enneasite:

    Flow #1: sp/so —> so/sx —> sx/sp :: Compelled toward people/participation/involvement

    Flow #2: sp/sx —> sx/so —> so/sp :: Compelled against and/or solipsistically away from people
    You can learn more about its origins here:

    Stackings · EnneaSite

    16types got an enneagram subforum after the enneagram had been stuffed into the psychology subforum for nearly a decade. enneasite's stuff on stackings hit 16types like a tidal wave and the rest was history. they eventually got their own enneagram subform. fter the enneasite and stackemup resources started to circulate, that sparked more enthusiasm.

    The two people to read at the 16types for the enneagram are kill4me and woofwoofl. They appear to be the most knowledgable enneagrammers. kill is excellent at enneagram typing and woof is excellent at fleshing the enneagram types out.

  5. #5
    Spoiled Brat 🍒 Masokissed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    7w8 sx/so
    Socionics
    SEE Se
    Posts
    929

    Default

    I relate to both. I kind of disagree with 'rejecting the human condition', so syn-flow?
    I want my cake and I wanna eat it too

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Corn Dispenser View Post
    I relate to both. I kind of disagree with 'rejecting the human condition', so syn-flow?
    I think I get the point of whoever developed this concept. While the rejecting part can be literal, I don't think that was the intention. For example, I think sp/sx has a very inward quality. It's like a snake coiling into itself. These types of people could come across as rejecting the human race, or what you and might deem the "mainstream," by simply being "them," by being absorbed by their own needs and concerns. So I can see them as having an inadvertent effect of going against the norm / protocol / standards (social last).
    Likes Masokissed, ESFJ liked this post

  7. #7
    4x9 cascadeco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Enneagram
    4 so/sp
    Posts
    6,939

    Default

    I can't say I really *like* the contra description in OP, it seems biased and pretty negative compared to the syn description. I try not to be as 'separate'/observing vs part of and embracing, but I'm probably more naturally contra even if again it makes me sound like a bad person.
    "...On and on and on and on he strode, far out over the sands, singing wildly to the sea, crying to greet the advent of the life that had cried to him." - James Joyce

    My Photography and Watercolor Fine Art Prints!!! Cascade Colors Fine Art Prints
    https://docs.google.com/uc?export=do...Gd5N3NZZE52QjQ

  8. #8
    Spoiled Brat 🍒 Masokissed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    7w8 sx/so
    Socionics
    SEE Se
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duffy View Post
    I understand how sp/sx would work but why is sx/so contra-flow? Is it because sx need for intensity and so need for social security leads sx/so people to join counter-culture groups? So they're "anti-social" and "contra-flow" even though they're really not?
    I want my cake and I wanna eat it too

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Corn Dispenser View Post
    I understand how sp/sx would work but why is sx/so contra-flow? Is it because sx need for intensity and so need for social security leads sx/so people to join counter-culture groups? So they're "anti-social" and "contra-flow" even though they're really not?
    Reducing the sx instinct to it's most basic: it's the thing that drives us to mate, hence, sexual. Human beings are complex, so we find clever ways to deal with sexual impulses. The extracurricular stuff associated with it, like intensity, obsession, merging and desirability are the various manifestations. I think the social instinct is aware of group dynamics, but not necessarily drawn to joining groups, not always. So when people talk about being tuned to the emotional temperature of a room, they may be indicating their concern with how everyone is interacting with each other, and in relation to themselves.

    With that said, I can see why you're wondering how the two mesh, as it seems to contradicts one another. Sexual feels more selfish and destructive, whereas social is more altruistic, and keen on how it's affecting others.... but I think that's the point - Those attributes can exist in the same person. I'm thinking about the people we label bipolar. I think when a person is sx dominant, there's more of a desire to attract. With social as a middling preference, I wonder if it's serving the primary instinct more than telling the person chillout because it's not cool (contrast with so/sx). There's more of a desire to "act out," using the social domain as a platform to fulfill sx needs.... something like that. And I figure with sp in the backseat, there are no brakes so to speak. So this leads to what's deemed as "inappropriate" behavior, "contra-flow." That's how I interpret it.

    references
    Likes Masokissed, Hawthorne liked this post

  10. #10
    Senior Member sulfit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    6w5 sp/so
    Posts
    492

    Default

    I get along more naturally with those in syn flow, at the same time as cascadeco has noted the contra-flow description reads as too negative and discouraging to type into and needs to be rescripted.

Similar Threads

  1. Ebb and flow of spirituality
    By Lark in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-24-2010, 02:20 PM
  2. Hustle and Flow
    By Orangey in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-29-2010, 09:47 PM
  3. Types and the flow
    By alcea rosea in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 08-13-2010, 12:15 PM
  4. Women, "Play Nice" and the Danger Instinct
    By Domino in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 04-11-2009, 09:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts