You can be great at the first one too, its just that that one ties in with your ego, and its concerns, so you tend to go overboard on it, and potentially, due to the stress it can cause you, not as great at it as the second instinct as that one doesn't tie into your ego, it's just something you handle well - no muss, no fuss- style.
I'd say you are definitely sp-dom, as that is clearly where your focus is at. I'd also say that that has its...consequences though, and shows in your stress-moments.
Do me! do me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!oneoneone!!!111eleven1!111111 !!!!!!!!1oneone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111!!!!!1!1 1eeleven!!!!1!11eeleven!!!!1!11eeleven!!!!1!11eele ven!!111!!!
To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing.
~ Elbert Hubbard Music provides one of the clearest examples of a much deeper relation between mathematics and human experience.
According to him, the 479 tritype is soc/sx, and that actually fits my little sister remarkably well (I've typed her as 497 soc/sx). So, I'm saying that I, too, think there's something to this.
Yeah, I'm not sure whether I'd be more 497 or 496. Think it's a tossup. (Though I say that in a super high level sense, knowing what I know about 6 and 7, as, I haven't delved into tritype or read the descriptions, really) For a while I was considering so/sx. It's hard to tease out upbringing vs. natural self. I was raised in the most sp-dom environment possible, but sp stuff causes me lots of anxiety and I tend to do some, I'll say, rather sx-ish things in life.
"...On and on and on and on he strode, far out over the sands, singing wildly to the sea, crying to greet the advent of the life that had cried to him." - James Joyce
I meant fours. Why would I care about anything else?
I can forward you the email he sent me, but I'll have to be at a computer where I can access that account first. I'll send you a PM when I can. (Anyone else who is interested can send me a PM; would prefer not to rip off his ideas publicly).