User Tag List

First 23456 Last

Results 31 to 40 of 65

  1. #31
    Senior Member lauranna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Enneagram
    9w8 sx/sp
    Posts
    747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rasofy View Post
    *waits for every sx female to claim they don't belong to the second category*
    Except me. Predictably.

  2. #32
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    B) wild, intensity junky, promiscuous, "sex drugs and rock and roll"
    Assuming I am an Sx dom, I'm definitely this.

    I never understood the reason behind or wanted true love or soul mates. It's a bit weird I think. Relationships could be worked on especially the two involved parties have a chemistry. No need to go in search of soul mates. Find a girl you love, who would love you back and you'd miss her when she is not around and ............ Omgoshhhhh I sound like an option (A).

    *Silently leaves the thread*

  3. #33
    Senior Member Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    ........... Omgoshhhhh I sound like an option (A).

    *Silently leaves the thread*
    *rakes you back in*

    Nopez ... going by your statement preceding the one I've left up, you're most likely not an sx-dom. SO/SP seems more likely.

  4. #34
    Senior Member Chaotic Harmony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    9w1 sx
    Posts
    1,436

    Default

    Hmm.... I can honestly say from 18-26 I was in the second category... And then I finally stopped my partying and wild-child days and settled down and am now firmly in the first category... So... Uh... Maybe it depends on maturity too?

    Oh hell... Who am I kidding... From 16-26 I was in the first category....


  5. #35
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
    *rakes you back in*

    Nopez ... going by your statement preceding the one I've left up, you're not an sx-dom. SO/SP seems more likely.
    You should say this as loud as possible. I want to see the reaction of people (especially vent regulars) as to what they think of this statement. Hmmmm... go paste than in my 'what is my-type' thread!!!

    Oh yes....

  6. #36
    Senior Member Phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Riva View Post
    Oh yes....
    Ummm .. No, thank you. The reason why I said you're not an sx-dom is because you just said this:

    I never understood the reason behind or wanted true love or soul mates. It's a bit weird I think.
    I dunno about other sx-doms --- but to me that almost sounds blasphemous! How can one not want a soulmate that one can completely merge with in a symbiotic relationship. When I separate from my partner or someone I've merged with, it feels like a part of my being is being amputated from me. It's both pain and pleasure - but the pain of distance itself is something of a pleasure because returning to her makes it all the more pleasurable.

    That said, I had my fill of Type me threads after my own 26 page epic back on PerC - and of course the fact that no matter who I tried to help with their type and how hard, they always had a counter-argument to support being the type they want to be.

    You're what you choose to be and let's just leave it at that.

    *curses 9-fix and walks away*

  7. #37
    Riva
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
    How can one not want a soulmate that one can completely merge with in a symbiotic relationship. When I separate from my partner or someone I've merged with, it feels like a part of my being is being amputated from me. It's both pain and pleasure - but the pain of distance itself is something of a pleasure because returning to her makes it all the more pleasurable.


    I must surely not be an Sx dom.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
    and of course the fact that no matter who I tried to help with their type and how hard, they always had a counter-argument to support being the type they want to be.
    I have absolutely no counter arguments to support mine because I have no intention of defending eNtp claims at present. But I sure know what my type is.

    Hmmmm....

    We are totally dragging the conversation off topic. My fault.

    *Leaves thread*

  8. #38
    libtard SJW chickpea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    4,958

    Default

    I'm both. I like sex drugs & rocknroll the best with a partner in crime. honestly most of my boyfriends have been bad influences in some way and are the ones who get me in the most thrill-seeking situations. plus love itself is an intense, wild experience for me. monogamous doesn't have to mean sappy.

  9. #39
    royal member Rasofy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/sx
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lauranna View Post
    Except me. Predictably.
    I actually considered adding ''except lauranna'', but that could sound indelicate.
    -----------------

    A man builds. A parasite asks 'Where is my share?'
    A man creates. A parasite says, 'What will the neighbors think?'
    A man invents. A parasite says, 'Watch out, or you might tread on the toes of God... '


    -----------------

  10. #40
    Dreaming the life onemoretime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    MBTI
    3h50
    Socionics
    ILE
    Posts
    4,460

    Default

    There are probably three types, and if you buy into tritype/trifix, they are likely defined by the different gut fixations. This is my guess; I may be completely off.

    8-flavored - active seeking of merging and immersive experiences. Willingness to exert one's influence to acquire these kinds of experiences. A preference for merging of the external into the internal, rather than the other way around. The "sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll" variety

    9-flavored - inclination toward perceiving experience as immersive. Will seek merging experiences out, but only out of a desire for intensification, and not a lack of such. A balance of the two kinds that @Elfboy described

    1-flavored - desire for merging may be tempered by a need for perfection. Will seek out people and things to intensely focus upon, but can hold out until the object is judged to be sufficient. This is more of the "true love" type.

    At the same time, the other fixations make the manifestations of these vary significantly.

Similar Threads

  1. [INTJ] Two types of INTJs
    By sculpting in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-24-2015, 05:34 AM
  2. [sx] How do other instinctual types see Sx Dom ?
    By NK258 in forum Instinctual Subtypes
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-16-2014, 09:08 PM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-07-2013, 08:43 AM
  4. There are basicly two types of people
    By Munchies in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 04:21 PM
  5. Two types of THC
    By entropie in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 03:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO