2/ Deluding people and telling them only what they want to hear, is an irresponsible attitude.
What you're doing is exactly like telling people who smoke that "we do not have all the datas, so we can't judge whether smoking is bad or good for your health". It's absurd!
It is a classic sophistry.
You probably know as well as me that science is an infinite process, that behind a question will always lie another question. If we follow your path of reasoning, then we should never be allowed to say anything, because we will always lack so-called" complete datas. If we follow your path of reasoning, then science is useless, then scientists are failures. And if you really want to play that childish game, then I should add that nobody can be objective, and that includes you.