User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 11 to 20 of 63

  1. #11
    Symbolic Herald Vasilisa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010


    2.6 = introvert
    58 on the Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale
    the formless thing which gives things form!
    Found Forum Haiku Project

    Positive Spin | your feedback welcomed | Darker Criticism

  2. #12


    1.25, introvert
    53 on MCNS

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  3. #13
    Vaguely Precise Seymour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    5w4 sx/so


    I hate doing arithmetic, so I whipped up javascript versions of the quizzes:

    Introversion Quiz

    Covert Narcissism

    These are very lightly tested (I just threw them together), so don't necessarily trust the results. Still, seems to work for me.

    My results:

    Introversion: 1.90 (introverted)
    MCNS: 51 (average, almost low)

  4. #14
    Diabolical Kasper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    9w8 so/sx



    2.7 and 54... yet I am an Extrovert, just not a very good one

    Am all for people getting over the inane stereotypes of Introvert = deep thinker/introspective, Extrovert = all the things they aren't.

  5. #15
    I could do things Hard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    1w2 sp/so
    EIE Fe


    Quote Originally Posted by Kasper View Post

    2.7 and 54... yet I am an Extrovert, just not a very good one

    Am all for people getting over the inane stereotypes of Introvert = deep thinker/introspective, Extrovert = all the things they aren't.
    Me thinks you might just have a case of the lazy, ye one who hides amongst the shadows .

    The studies really do kind of shake the foundation of what it means to be extroverted though. I think there's equally as many people who see themselves as extroverts but are actually introverted. A lot of it does come from the standpoint of dominance which is historically not really associated with extroversion from what I've noticed. I agree with the studies and their findings, but it's still interesting. It also leads me to wonder how this would apply to individuals with depression or depression-like mental illness, and anxiety mental illnesses. It could really cloud ones nature in the I/E spectrum, and it's something I have certainly experienced in the past.
    MBTI: ExxJ tetramer
    Functions: Fe > Te > Ni > Se > Si > Ti > Fi > Ne
    Enneagram: 1w2 - 3w4 - 6w5 (The Taskmaster) | sp/so
    Socionics: β-E dimer | -
    Big 5: slOaI
    Temperament: Choleric/Melancholic
    Alignment: Lawful Neutral
    External Perception: Nohari and Johari

  6. #16
    Level 8 Propaganda Bot SpankyMcFly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    461 so/sx


    I scored a 3.2
    and a 49, which seems too low
    "The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... Some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age. " - H.P. Lovecraft

  7. #17
    Senior Member prplchknz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007


    I know i'm not sensitive, special, or highly intelligent, I also don't have social anxiety or shy. But I know I'm an introvert. You can be totally fine walking up to strangers and asking questions and still be introvert. or you can be totally not fine walking up to strangers and asking questions and still be an extrovert. Social situations drain me, and not because i'm anxious they just do.

    But because I id as an Introvert, I don't think i'm unicorn poop or anything.
    In no likes experiment.

    that is all

    i dunno what else to say so

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2010


    definitional switching, is what this is called.

    and also, again, what's with the undercurrent of negative labeling? psychology, or shall i call it, pop psychology is ridden with prescriptive as opposed to descriptive labels. one characteristic i like about the mbti is how it is descriptive whereas much of psychology is prescriptive. forgive me, but isn't psychology still in its infancy? less than 100 years old? and yet we feel competent enough apply it so confidently? enough to prescribe psychoactive drugs altering something as essential brain chemistry? the modern day drug push is no better than the mushing of the prefrontal cortex as a remedy for...who knows what...

    psychology has a lot of blood on its hands, and it's the prescriptive "negative labeling" that's one reason why.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    4w5 sp
    INFj Ne



    That seems correct, I'd definitely call myself an ambivert, a modest one. I understand why I may seem like an introvert to many in real life.

  10. #20
    untitled Chanaynay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    7w6 sx/so


    Scored 4.0 on the I/E test, so again another test marks me as an extrovert. Good. Well the only time I ever scored introvert was on the similarminds JCF test. It put me as INFP because I scored 95% Ne and 100% Fi.

    Scored 47 on the covert narcissist test. So I'm below average but not exactly "low" in covert narcissism.
    7w6 - 2w3 - 8w7 sx/so

Similar Threads

  1. Ne Users--Definitions of Extroversion and Introversion
    By j0mm in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-19-2017, 06:28 PM
  2. What definition of I and E do you find most useful?
    By UnitOfPopulation in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-06-2014, 09:11 PM
  3. The Dualistic Nature of ENTJs and ESTJs
    By LunarMoon in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 08:40 PM
  4. Concerns over the scientific wellbeing of Type threads
    By Nocapszy in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 08-29-2008, 10:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO