User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

  1. #1

    Default Diener Labs Discoveries about Happiness

    Discoveries - Ed Diener, Positive Psychology

    Defining and Measuring Happiness (or Subjective Well-Being)
    Popular writers focus on the causes of happiness, but defining and measuring it is a more basic first step for the advance of a science of happiness.
    1. We have found that most people around the world, except those living in dire circumstances, report being happy the majority of the time, but very few report being consistently elated or extremely happy. Thus, slight to moderate happiness is the rule rather than the exception.
    2. Life satisfaction, pleasant emotions, and unpleasant emotions are separable, different components of happiness and unhappiness. Life satisfaction differs from the affective components of happiness in that it is based on a reflective judgment. In addition, there is the distinction between eudaimonic happiness and hedonic happiness, the first being characterized more by virtue and reason, and the latter being characterized by pleasure. We argue that each facet of well-being is deserving of scientific study, regardless of which one researchers might argue is true happiness
    3. Self-reports of subjective well-being have substantial validity, as demonstrated by their convergence with other types of measures such as informant reports and biological measures of well-being. Although certain response artifacts such as a respondents' current mood can bias the reports, we have found that these usually pose little threat to validity.
    4. We have used experience-sampling (the repeated recording of emotions at random moments over time) to assess well-being, and have developed additional measures based on memory for good versus bad events, and satisfaction of global versus specific aspects of life. We also created a 5-item scale to assess life satisfaction (the SWLS), and this measure has shown substantial validity.
    5. Besides components of well-being such as pleasant affect and life satisfaction, happiness can be divided into on-line (momentary) feelings, the later recall of those on-line feelings, and broad evaluations of life. These three forms of happiness differ in systematic ways. For example, sometimes recall predicts future behavior better than on-line feelings, contradicting a simple Skinnerian view in which the experience of rewards automatically leads to behavior.
    6. People's moods frequently go up and down, but there is substantial stability over time and across situations in the average levels of mood and emotions that a person feels.
    7. Over time there is a tendency for people to use the same types of information in judging satisfaction with life, and therefore life satisfaction tends to be relatively stable in the short term (e.g., 1 year), but is somewhat less stable in the long term (e.g., 10 years) due to systematic changes that may occur in life conditions (e.g., widowhood or unemployment).
    8. In defining happiness, the frequency of positive emotional experience can be separated from its intensity. It appears that frequent positive feelings are sufficient for happiness without these experiences being intense. Levels of emotional intensity are independent of levels of happiness.


    Causes and Processes
    1. Our research supports the idea of Costa and McCrae that personality factors such as extraversion and neuroticism are important determinants of happiness. Extraversion, for example, is related to feeling more positive emotions, and neuroticism is strongly related to feeling more negative emotions. The positive emotion component of extraversion is sufficient to explain the contribution of extraversion to life satisfaction, and the depression component of neuroticism is necessary and sufficient to explain the effects of neuroticism on life satisfaction.
    2. Our research with twins supports Lykken, Tellegen, and Bouchard's conclusion that subjective well-being is in part genetically determined.
    3. Although adaptation to conditions occurs, our research revises the idea of the "hedonic treadmill" in significant ways: A. People return to a personal set-point, usually in the positive zone, not to neutrality, and B. Certain life events can change a person's set-point, and this occurs for many individuals over a 15-year period. We now have substantial evidence that people do not completely adapt to all conditions.
    4. Social comparisons can influence subjective well-being, but our studies indicate that these effects are much less pervasive than is often presumed.
    5. Working toward goals and achieving them are sources of well-being, and because goals and values differ between people, the sources of happiness to some extent differ. But there are likely universal causes of subjective well-being too, such as quality social relationships and having basic physiological needs fulfilled.
    6. The relation between income and happiness is intricate. Although money is not on average a major source of the individual differences in well-being in wealthier nations, it can make a substantial difference in poor societies where basic needs are not fully met. Materialism, valuing money more than other things such as relationships, is usually a negative predictor of well-being. However, wealthy nations are considerably happier than very poor societies, although people in very poor cultures can be happy if their basic needs are met.
    7. The happiest people all appear to have strong social relationships.


    Happiness is Desirable
    1. People throughout the world, not just in the USA, believe that happiness is an important and valuable goal.
    2. However, people want not just to be happy, they want to be happy for the right reasons - for things they value. Happiness is thus a moral imperative, not simply a hedonistic one. Happiness results from people's values.
    3. Not only does happiness feel good, but happy people appear to function better than unhappy people - making more money, having better social relationships, being better organizational citizens at work, doing more volunteer work, and having better health.
    4. Although happy people do better than unhappy people in most realms of life, a person need not be super-happy. In fact, we find that high achievers are often moderately or very happy, not extremely happy.
    5. Because happiness has beneficial consequences beyond feeling good, we have proposed that nations should assess the subjective well-being of citizens just as they monitor the economy, to serve as information for policy-making, business leaders, and individuals.


    Culture and Well-Being
    1. There are unique predictors of happiness in cultures. For example, we find that self-esteem, consistency, and purpose are weaker predictors of well-being in collectivist societies than in individualistic societies.
    2. We consistently find that Latin societies are happier than East Asian societies. Norms for feeling happy and unhappy also differ across nations, with those in Latin nations valuing positive emotions more than do East Asians.
    3. In terms of measuring happiness across nations, we find that there are certain pleasant and unpleasant emotions that cluster similarly in all areas of the world, and on which people can be compared universally, but that other emotions such as pride differ across cultures in whether they are seen as desirable and pleasant. Furthermore, cultures differ in the importance they assign to being happy compared to other values and goals.
    4. Work on life satisfaction across cultures suggests that people might use response scales differently, and react to items differently, calling for more sophisticated levels of analyses.
    5. People vary more in positive feelings across situations in some cultures than in others. Even though individuals tend to be consistent in their rank order of happy feelings, situations can exert a larger effect on moods in cultures (e.g., in East Asia versus the USA) where consistency is not highly valued.
    6. Thus far our research has not found significant effects of language translation or the use of indigenous (local) emotion words on the measurement of well-being.
    Thoughts?

    I know there is a lot to digest, but maybe pick out one or two discoveries and post your thoughts on them.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  2. #2
    Retired Member Wonkavision's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    Causes and Processes

    Our research supports the idea of Costa and McCrae that personality factors such as extraversion and neuroticism are important determinants of happiness. Extraversion, for example, is related to feeling more positive emotions, and neuroticism is strongly related to feeling more negative emotions. The positive emotion component of extraversion is sufficient to explain the contribution of extraversion to life satisfaction, and the depression component of neuroticism is necessary and sufficient to explain the effects of neuroticism on life satisfaction.....
    They seem to be using "Extraversion" and "Neuroticism" in some kind of bi-polar dichotomy.


    I would assume they are NOT using the term "Extraversion" in the MBTI sense.

    They must mean it in the general sense, as in "outgoing, upbeat, positive, etc.", right?


    If they ARE using it in the MBTI sense, then they are total asswipes.
    __________________


    I'M OUTTA HERE.

    IT'S BEEN FUN.

    TAKE CARE.

    PEACE OUT!!!


  3. #3

    Default

    The are using Extroversion and Neuroticism from the Big 5 or Five Factor Model.

    The correlations aren't surprising, since positive affect is one of the components of Extroversion in the FFM, and negative affect is one of the components in Neuroticsm. As they say the components are "sufficient" to explain the connections.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  4. #4
    Uniqueorn William K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    986

    Default

    However, people want not just to be happy, they want to be happy for the right reasons - for things they value. Happiness is thus a moral imperative, not simply a hedonistic one. Happiness results from people's values.
    I'm rather surprised with this one. They seem to be saying that doing the morally right thing brings more happiness than something 'bad'. But there are many cases of people doing everything they can to get what they want, regardless of how morally correct their actions are. Of course, whether getting what you want brings you happiness is another matter.
    4w5, Fi>Ne>Ti>Si>Ni>Fe>Te>Se, sp > so > sx

    appreciates being appreciated, conflicted over conflicts, afraid of being afraid, bad at being bad, predictably unpredictable, consistently inconsistent, remarkably unremarkable...

    I may not agree with what you are feeling, but I will defend to death your right to have a good cry over it

    The whole problem with the world is that fools & fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. ~ Bertrand Russell

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William K View Post
    I'm rather surprised with this one. They seem to be saying that doing the morally right thing brings more happiness than something 'bad'. But there are many cases of people doing everything they can to get what they want, regardless of how morally correct their actions are. Of course, whether getting what you want brings you happiness is another matter.
    It could be that the means actually change the ends in these cases.

    Perhaps people with consciences have trouble being happy with ill-gotten gains.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  6. #6
    pathwise dependent FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w8
    Socionics
    ENTj
    Posts
    5,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wonkavision View Post
    They seem to be using "Extraversion" and "Neuroticism" in some kind of bi-polar dichotomy.


    I would assume they are NOT using the term "Extraversion" in the MBTI sense.

    They must mean it in the general sense, as in "outgoing, upbeat, positive, etc.", right?


    If they ARE using it in the MBTI sense, then they are total asswipes.
    Big-5, usually. I've read papers where it was shown how self-reported happiness was related to Big-5 extraversion score, although of course the usage of self-reported happiness is a debatable decision.

    I'm rather surprised by the difference between East Asian cultures (I suppose they mostly mean Chinese) and Latin, which I'm part of. I used to be friends with a good number of chinese people when I lived in Denmark, and it seemed like our life-values were quite in line, much nearer than the values of northern europeans, for both of our cultures.
    ENTj 7-3-8 sx/sp

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William K View Post
    I'm rather surprised with this one. They seem to be saying that doing the morally right thing brings more happiness than something 'bad'. But there are many cases of people doing everything they can to get what they want, regardless of how morally correct their actions are. Of course, whether getting what you want brings you happiness is another matter.
    Well, if a person does whatever they can to get what they want, they're probably not compromising on their own moral values. They just have different moral values than everybody else. And if they do have the same basic values as everyone else, then they probably won't be happy when they get what they want because they'll feel too much guilt and shame.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    It makes sense to me because it's my own personal approach. (Value based happiness.) I could easily be happier by becoming more social, setting goals, and exercising, but what I'm really looking for is life satisfaction. The big picture. I want to be happy because I'm doing something that's meaningful to me. I don't just simply want to manipulate my emotions. Although becoming happier day to day would increase the likelihood of me actually achieving my dreams, so it's not something to shun.

    I've learned about two kinds of happiness previously. Life satisfaction, and what I would call day to day happiness. I don't remember the actual term. Some people are high in one kind of happiness and low in the other. Someone who suffers from depression and is usually miserable day to day can still follow their dreams and do things that are important to them. When they look back on their lives, they don't regret a thing. Their life satisfaction is high. They could say "Even though I was miserable, I played a very important role in raising my children and I'm glad about that." The other kind of people remind me drug addicts, off the top of my head. They might always party and always seek momentary happiness whenever they can (hedonistic), but their live satisfaction may be very low whenever they stop to think about it.

    For me personally, the life satisfaction kind of happiness has always been a lot more important. I wonder who else around here is the same? My goal now is to realize I can pursue both kinds of happiness at the same and actually make progress faster.
    "When a resolute young fellow steps up the great bully, the world, and takes him boldly by the beard, he is often surprised to find that it comes off in his hand, and that it was only tied on to scare away the timid adventurers." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Similar Threads

  1. The most depressing discovery about the brain, ever
    By Olm the Water King in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-01-2016, 04:04 AM
  2. Materialism, how does a system come about which doesnt result in happiness?
    By Survive & Stay Free in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-19-2011, 11:38 PM
  3. Post about what makes you happy!!!
    By Curator in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 08:09 AM
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 11:28 AM
  5. The thing about "Happy Holidays"
    By Haphazard in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12-21-2009, 04:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO