It took Ygolo's explanation for me to understand. There's no way I could have, on my best of days, gotten that in under 5 minutes. A good portion of time was lost on me trying to figure out how to even interpret the question.
Go to sleep, iguana.
INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp. Live and let live will just amount to might makes right
I don't think it's a smartass answer. It's true, certain assumptions are made, and without outside direction, you can make up a variety of conclusions. But the assumption is that things are in the order they are in for some reason, and you have to figure out what's going on.
It's as much a test of your ability to find patterns as it is to view things from multiple different ways.
Also, it should be noted that we don't know what the test was looking for. Most the tests I have taken like this have suggested you give the "best" or "most accurate" response.
And check out my ugly diagram that explains things, if you still don't get it.
stain likes this
an assuption of a patterm is (could be) an expectation of a pseudo-intelligent author.
all ENFPs that had epic fail on any IQ test, you actually got all the questions correct due to status quo expectation of what is known as 'pattern picking peer presure'
everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?
That wasn't so hard, all you have to do is pay really close attention to the fine details. Look at one ball in one position. Example: look at the top ball and find a pattern with the other top balls, look at the top left ball and find a pattern with the other top left balls, and do the same with each individual ball to find a pattern with each. It really makes since in the end.