Learning Styles

[ygolo]

Learning Styles Online.com - including a free inventory

My Preferences:

Visual 4

Social 5

Physical 5

Aural 5

Verbal 9

Solitary 15

Logical 13

Is there any known relationship between learning styles and cognitive processes.

 

[Usehername]

Style Scores
Visual 5
Social 9
Physical 7
Aural 11
Verbal 10
Solitary 19
Logical 13

 

[Zergling]

Visual 10
Social 5
Physical 8
Aural 12
Verbal 7
Solitary 14
Logical 14

 

[Recoleta]

Visual 11
Social 14
Physical 12
Aural 7
Verbal 14
Solitary 13
Logical 9

 

[Keoren]

Visual 16
Aural 13 (learn very little from speech, but alot through music)
Verbal 13
Physical 6
Logical 15
Social 5
Solitary 18

 

[Athenian200]

Visual 1
Social 8
Physical 4
Aural 9
Verbal 16
Solitary 13
Logical 10

The order is: Verbal, Solitary, Logical, Aural, Social, Physical, Visual

There isn't a relation as far as I know... but I think we should try to create one from the results of this test.

 

[Splittet]

Visual 17
Social 7
Physical 3
Aural 6
Verbal 4
Solitary 16
Logical 17

I am not very well-rounded.

 

[Park]

Visual 17

Social 9

Physical 13

Aural 17

Verbal 17

Solitary 17

Logical 12

 

[usernameredacted]

Visual: 2
Social: 6
Physical: 3
Aural: 17
Verbal: 13
Solitary: 18
Logical: 15

 

[usernameredacted]

The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. We should be grateful for it and hope that it will remain valid in future research and that it will extend, for better or for worse, to our pleasure, even though perhaps also to our bafflement, to wide branches of learning.
-Eugene Wigner

Your signature gives me a headache... Too many big words, I say!

 

[ygolo]

Visual 17
Social 7
Physical 3
Aural 6
Verbal 4
Solitary 16
Logical 17

I am not very well-rounded.

These are measurements of preferences (as you see them in yourself). You don't get brownie points for being "well-rounded" or even total number of points. I think the main idea is to help you figure out how to train yourself (At least that is the approach in most learning styles material I have read. Memletics may be different).

 

[narticus]

Visual 7
Aurul 13
Verbal 10
Physical 3
Logiacal 12
Social 7
Solitary 14

 

[Sahara]

Style Scores

Visual 8

Social 10

Physical 13

Aural 15

Verbal 18

Solitary 14

Logical 7

 

[Splittet]

These are measurements of preferences (as you see them in yourself). You don't get brownie points for being "well-rounded" or even total number of points. I think the main idea is to help you figure out how to train yourself (At least that is the approach in most learning styles material I have read. Memletics may be different).

Hehe, yeah, I know the seven intelligences theory quite well. But I kind of feel it is a problem I am not well-rounded, which is why I comment on it. I know my mathematical, visual and intrapersonal intelligence is strong, but it kind of annoys me my others are so weak. It’s like I cannot do the other four intelligences.

 

[The_Liquid_Laser]

Visual 10

Social 15

Physical 6

Aural 15

Verbal 13

Solitary 15

Logical 13


Considering my weakest style is Physical I believe that I will be "well rounded" both mentally and physically.

 

[Splittet]

Considering my weakest style is Physical I believe that I will be "well rounded" both mentally and physically.

I get the feeling most ENTPs and ENFPs are ... INTJs maybe not so much.

 

[ygolo]

I get the feeling most ENTPs and ENFPs are ... INTJs maybe not so much.

Do you mean ENPs are well-rounded in terms of learning styles or "well-rounded" physically?

All the ENTPs I've know have been thin (save one).

Notwithstanding somatypes, I don't think there is going to be much of a connection betweeen MBTI type and how thin they are.

 

[The_Liquid_Laser]

I think he means learning styles. As a type INTJ's tend to be incredibly focused. I don't think it to be much of a surprise that an INTJ would focus toward a few styles of learning, while an ENTP would be open to a variety of learning styles without heavily focusing on one.

 

[Splittet]

Do you mean ENPs are well-rounded in terms of learning styles or "well-rounded" physically?

I meant in terms of learning styles. Seems like I didn't quite get something there, but I do now at least. Anyway, I am Norwegian, so I can just blame it on the English. Sorry.

 

[ygolo]

I meant in terms of learning styles. Seems like I didn't quite get something there, but I do now at least. Anyway, I am Norwegian, so I can just blame it on the English. Sorry.

I was just making sure. Some people (like me) have some strange ideas.