That must be why I use technical analysis to predict future trends in the financial markets.
I only care about what's immediate. Yeah right, pal.
Caring only about the immediate, drives me insane.
Your batting average with me really sucks,
and getting worse by the minute.
Of course there are INFPs with well-developed Ts; that's not what MBTI measures. It measures preference in frequency of use, not strength of each individual characteristic.
It ASSUMES a predetermined function order.
It ASSUMES frequency of use.
Singer-Loomis removed the restrictive assumptions MBTI implemented,
and actually let's a person see frequency of use,
as well as their own individual function order.
(Not the function order of someone else)
Why you keep going on like this, claiming to know MBTI,
when clearly you don't, is amusing.
The reason you think functions are bullshit is it's too complex for you.It cuts the function bullshit
You need something simple, so you don't get confused.
And if you think the functions are "bullshit," you think Jung is bullshit.
Myers and Briggs ripped off Jung's functions.
No, you want to keep thinking you understand.I already understand why you think that
That's the problem with you and those like you.
You'd make a dangerous juror.
Truth and justice would fly right out the window.
This is reminding me of another debate 2 people were having,
elsewhere on the board.
It was between an alleged, INTP and an ENTJ.
Needless to say, I was totally in sync with one viewpoint,
but not the other.
What you keep babbling on about is not an S thing, pal.
Yeah, I know, it will still fly over your head while you whistle dixie.
Here's a clue about my personality: I'd like this to have a resolution.
So since I know you will keep dragging this out, with no end in sight,
I'll close it out.
We disagree. B.F.D.
End of story.