In real life I have one trait that people fiind quite annoying.
That trait is that I want facts displayed as numbers or with numbers.
Without that in most cases the "facts" are pretty much useless.
Since I can't create any models and projections based on words like "many, small, changing, .......Etc".
In many cases it happened that someone accused me of something. But I requested the exact data for their claims and I request the exact time when it happened and how many times did it happen.
What they can't show since they don't have that information and they don't have it because they were not paying real attention.
What they are doing is accusation based on their convictions and their picture of me. So I start the counter-attack that they base their actions on convictions. When I do that the person automaticly thinks I am mean towards them. I am sorry but I don't accept arguments " You did something wrong" or "You are doing something wrong" if you can't make a clear argument.
The main reason why I am "mean" to other people is that tomorrow they can claim the opposite of what they are claiming today. What is probably the byproduct of moodswings in many cases.
I have concluded that because the words and opinions that people say usually match their mood.
Because of this I don't give weight to many words which are said by certain people. Even if it is designed as friendly advice. But that is another story.
So people in real life think that I am insensitive and calculated son of bitch and they are annoyed by the fact that I carry the title with pride.
I live in a society where calculations and plans are considered to be flaws.
Even my own parents think that I should be be more spontaneous and sensitive. I admit that in many cases my conversations can sound like police investigations if I think that topic is important. But to a large degree this is because I have to pull out the information out of people.
Also may time it happend that people we sure that they know something and how to solve some hypotetical case/problem. But once you place the entire thing into numbers and do the calculation it becomes obvious that they have missed for 6 levels of size. What means 1 000 000 times.
Which is not small error. That happened once to me but people in general seem to have the trait that they don't check out the idea in the form of numbers.
Just because something looks as a good or as a convincing idea on verbal level, that does no mean that this is actually a good idea.
I would even dare to say that some people are afraid of me because they know that I can make analyse them and display the flaws cleary.
As someone once said
The every equation you place in your book will dimidiate the number of sold copies.
So, where is the problem? Why people have so many problems with this approach? I think that my requests are not so irrational.
The only thing I want are clear arguments and something with which I will be able to calculate/work with.
Is this/my approach too impersonal for you?