User Tag List

First 111920212223 Last

Results 201 to 210 of 236

  1. #201
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Help?

    Behavior: anticipate > avoid > pursue
    Emotional: turbulent > controlled = suppressed
    Motive: preservational > social > intimate

    So that means I'm either a 6>2>4 or a 6>4>2, right?


    Edit 9/6: controlled > suppressed to controlled = suppressed.
    Last edited by Random Ness; 09-06-2010 at 07:30 PM.

  2. #202
    Yeah, I can fly. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w6 sx/sp
    Socionics
    ILE Ti
    Posts
    3,644

    Default

    Correct. 6/4/2 or 6/2/4 sp/so.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Teacher (Idyllic), ESE-IEI (Si-ESFj), SLue|I|, Sanguine-Melancholy
    Sage, True Neutral (Chaotic Good), Type III Anti-Hero
    Inventive > Artistic > Leisurely > Dramatic
    7w6 > 4w3 > 9w8, weakside sp/so

    Dark Worker (Sacrificing)
    Freewheeling Designer

    Hayekian Asshole


  3. #203
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Cool. And it's accurate because a phobic 6 is much like a 4 and sometimes I test as a 2. Props to the creators!

  4. #204
    Occasional Member Evan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    1
    Posts
    4,223

    Default

    I like how aleksei has taken my place in this thread

    Oh, and to make my post not completely fluff: Thanks random ness!

  5. #205
    ^He pronks, too! Magic Poriferan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    Yin
    Enneagram
    One sx/sp
    Posts
    13,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evan View Post
    I like how aleksei has taken my place in this thread

    Oh, and to make my post not completely fluff: Thanks random ness!
    Hey there, stranger.

    Anything happen here that enrages you as a violation of all that is right with this idea?
    Go to sleep, iguana.


    _________________________________
    INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.
    Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

  6. #206
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENFJ
    Enneagram
    2w1
    Posts
    35

    Default

    So the order of the original enneagram is arbitrary? I never really got that thing fully. I started learning about wings and then my friend was like: Blah, blah wings are pointless. So now I just don't know what to think anymore.

  7. #207
    ^He pronks, too! Magic Poriferan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    Yin
    Enneagram
    One sx/sp
    Posts
    13,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emmilou View Post
    So the order of the original enneagram is arbitrary? I never really got that thing fully. I started learning about wings and then my friend was like: Blah, blah wings are pointless. So now I just don't know what to think anymore.
    To be clear, there's a little arbitration in everything. But the system elaborated here attempts to minimize arbitration and maximize deduction/inferrence from what was arbitrated. This can certainly not be said of the enneagram.
    Go to sleep, iguana.


    _________________________________
    INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.
    Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

  8. #208
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    ExTJ
    Enneagram
    3w4
    Posts
    1

    Default

    "I have stated several times before on this forum that I determined the original wing system to be baseless. The need for the wing type to be "adjacent" didn't make sense, since as my variable system indicates, the actual order of the numbers that the types were assigned is meaningless. There is no sensible reason that 7s should be next to 6s, for example. So, anything based off of that order, like the wings, needs to completely reformed."

    This is wrong.

  9. #209
    ^He pronks, too! Magic Poriferan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    Yin
    Enneagram
    One sx/sp
    Posts
    13,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pablonuts25 View Post
    "I have stated several times before on this forum that I determined the original wing system to be baseless. The need for the wing type to be "adjacent" didn't make sense, since as my variable system indicates, the actual order of the numbers that the types were assigned is meaningless. There is no sensible reason that 7s should be next to 6s, for example. So, anything based off of that order, like the wings, needs to completely reformed."

    This is wrong.
    You're not the first person to say that here, so why not take a look through the whole thead and see some of the discussion that took place about it?
    Go to sleep, iguana.


    _________________________________
    INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.
    Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

  10. #210
    Occasional Member Evan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    1
    Posts
    4,223

    Default

    LOL he created an account just to say that.

Similar Threads

  1. Check out this new and interesting view on the N/S dichotonomy
    By Kensei in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2015, 03:42 PM
  2. THE COMPLETE TYPE GROUPING ANALYSIS: By The Sponge.
    By Magic Poriferan in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2010, 02:31 AM
  3. Type Me (New and Improved With Marmite Flavour!)
    By Tigerlily in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 240
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 12:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO