User Tag List

First 12

Results 11 to 15 of 15

  1. #11
    alchemist Legion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Posts
    1,858

    Default

    It's a cool theory. As I said a few times, my interpretation is that to control another is to be controlled by that other, and also that all forms of existence - whether physical matter or imagination - are essentially the one substance.

    Then, we have soul (self), base material (representation of outer) and the spirit, which is the communicator between the two worlds.

    So, it means that though happiness we make others happy, and so on.

    Which means...

    The number 2.

    It means 2.

  2. #12
    outrun my gun Typh0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Enneagram
    3w4
    Socionics
    ENTj None
    Posts
    2,477

    Default

    Interesting system, it has potential, I think. Its too bad the author is no longer active.

  3. #13
    Honor Thy Inferior Such Irony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    INtp
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    5,091

    Default

    I suppose I'd be a 5, 6, or 7 in this system. One of the air types, but I'm not quite sure which.
    INtp
    5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
    Ravenclaw/Hufflepuff
    Neutral Good
    LII-Ne




  4. #14
    Junior Member Ayuhime's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    9w1 so/sx
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Hey, a Palpa thread. Didn't know that he was on TC as well
    Humankind is the one to 'domesticate' other beings and has most problem with 'domesticating' themselves.

    9w1 5w6 3w4 sp/so INTP LII-Ne
    Neutral Good
    Ravenpuff
    Agnostic AroAce Alien
    All the other fancy labels too, I guess.

    I only know that I really don't know anything and you probably don't too.

  5. #15

    Default

    This has no basis of logic at all. Not only are many of the systems of the Enneagram disrupted/broken in this, but there is no worthwhile reason given for that.

    No offense, but haphazard value-less attempts at innovation (simply for its own sake) are stupid and sad. One should not seek to simply create something (anything!) new, one should seek to understand first what already works-- understanding is what gives way to true, purposeful innovation. I'll never understand this feverish desire that humans sometimes have to fix what is very much not broken.
    Find my Enneagram writing here. Also, I'd love for you to take my six question Enneagram surveyEnneagram survey!✨
    Likes Ayuhime liked this post

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-10-2014, 08:28 PM
  2. Replies: 55
    Last Post: 01-10-2014, 05:35 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-10-2014, 11:42 AM
  4. An introduction to excess
    By wank in forum Welcomes and Introductions
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 03:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts