• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Four vs Six

B

brainheart

Guest
Neither and both. Ha! Ayo is much more bubbly, and Marm is way more aggressive. I'm somewhere in the middle.

My guess is this has more to do with stacking and wing than anything. So/sx 4w3s, in their external behaviors, often seem the furthest thing from me.

What if one prefers to not be seen at all crying?

Is it possible for ISFP's and/or enneagram 4's to become hardened and desensitized to overly emotional people?

I hide to cry, if and when I do. Crying for me is incredibly rare unless I'm super depressed. I relate a lot to what Naranjo says about self pres fours actually benefiting from crying, that they need to allow themselves to cry in order to heal. My guess is that this would have to do, for you, with a five wing and the presence of the self pres instinct.
 

Galena

Silver and Lead
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
3,786
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
The bolded is a distinction I've found to be very true. An INFP might start a conversation with something concrete but then the intuitive leaps start coming. INFPS express themselves best with figurative language. I know I get tired and antsy when conversation stays too focused on reality, and like I really don't have much to share.
For what it's worth, I relate way more to the INFP in this situation than the S, as someone who has Fi and Ni for sure. I'm likely not to talk much at all in a group until I've processed the content intuitively and can share my discoveries and clarifications.
 

Sunny Ghost

New member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
2,396
My guess is this has more to do with stacking and wing than anything. So/sx 4w3s, in their external behaviors, often seem the furthest thing from me.



I hide to cry, if and when I do. Crying for me is incredibly rare unless I'm super depressed. I relate a lot to what Naranjo says about self pres fours actually benefiting from crying, that they need to allow themselves to cry in order to heal. My guess is that this would have to do, for you, with a five wing and the presence of the self pres instinct.

Crying for me is more often from a feeling of defeat. And in the last few years, my defeat usually stems from financial woes and stress.

I actually feel somewhat like Natalie Portman's character in Hesher. What I can recall of her, anywho.

I wonder if there are any threads on Enneagram 4 type movies vs Enneagram 6 type movies.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
Crying for me is more often from a feeling of defeat. And in the last few years, my defeat usually stems from financial woes and stress.

I actually feel somewhat like Natalie Portman's character in Hesher. What I can recall of her, anywho.

I wonder if there are any threads on Enneagram 4 type movies vs Enneagram 6 type movies.

Enneagram 6 movies are your typical existential Indie film about working class 25 years old psuedo-hipsters trying to find their way in the world through love and companionship. Enneagram 4 movies are gonna be more 'grand', fantasy or period-based, since mainstream audiences aren't gonna relate to how the average enneagram 4 experience their day-to-day lives. 6 movies are gonna deal with existentialism, 4 movies are gonna deal with romance/isolation.

Mad Men is probably the most masterful example I've seen of a mainstream drama dealing with image type issues (the protagonist is a melancholic 3w4).
 

Sunny Ghost

New member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
2,396
Enneagram 6 movies are your typical existential Indie film about working class 25 years old psuedo-hipsters trying to find their way in the world through love and companionship. Enneagram 4 movies are gonna be more 'grand' and period-based, since mainstream audiences aren't gonna relate to how enneagram 4s experience their day-to-day lives.

Going off of that: Enneagram 6 movies would be like Adaptation and Lost in Translation and Stranger than Fiction and American Beauty.
Enneagram 4 movies would be... ?
 
B

brainheart

Guest
Going off of that: Enneagram 6 movies would be like Adaptation and Lost in Translation and Stranger than Fiction and American Beauty.
Enneagram 4 movies would be... ?


In my opinion four movies tend to be about going to the depths of the human soul. Tragic self exploration.

e4 movies:

A Single Man (Colin Firth's character is a four.)
Revolutionary Road (Kate Winslet's character is a sexual 4, Leonardo DiCaprio's is a social 6.)
Bright Star (Keats!)
Solaris and The Mirror (Tarkovsky is about as 4w5 as they come.)
Sylvia (kind of a bad movie but still...)
The 400 Blows
The Pianist
Anything by Ingmar Bergman
 

Sunny Ghost

New member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
2,396
In my opinion four movies tend to be about going to the depths of the human soul. Tragic self exploration.

e4 movies:

A Single Man (Colin Firth's character is a four.)
Revolutionary Road (Kate Winslet's character is a sexual 4, Leonardo DiCaprio's is a social 6.)
Bright Star (Keats!)
Solaris and The Mirror (Tarkovsky is about as 4w5 as they come.)
Sylvia (kind of a bad movie but still...)
The 400 Blows
The Pianist
Anything by Ingmar Bergman

I don't think I know any of those movies! Ha!

"Going to the depths of the human soul. Tragic self exploration." That sounds more accurate.

There's this wonderful movie called, "Paper Man" from 2009 with Emma Stone, Ryan Reynolds and stars Jeff Daniels, that is so incredibly 4-ish. The two main characters have their sort of imaginary friend. It's their wish for a savior. For Jeff Daniels character, this takes the form of a superhero, played by Ryan Reynolds. For Emma Stone, it takes the form of a boy who is tragically in love with her, played by Kieren Culkin.

I think I would put Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind in the four category.
 

Chad of the OttomanEmpire

Give me a fourth dot.
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
1,053
MBTI Type
NeTi
Enneagram
478
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
Like I've said in other places, I've mulled this question over myself, so I thought I'd join in. There's a real interesting conversation going on here!

If you suddenly became an integral, indistinguishable, ordinary, average member of a group of dependable happy/optimistic friends who cherish you and cater to your needs, would you be content or frustrated?

6s want to be liked and appreciated, 4s want to be understood and embraced for their essence. The Six is happy when the popular kids ask him to hang out, while the Four will still be sad regardless until he/she feels like a true, genuine connection has been made.

I dunno if that's the best distinguisher here. I personally would be very happy if I found a group of friends who liked me, accepted me, embraced me, and catered to my every need. This is like, The Unattainable in my life. I wouldn't want to be "just like them" and would probably leave if they forced me to wear a "group uniform" or something...but 4s sometimes want to fit in too. It's just that a) they don't want to sacrifice their true essence and b) they often just can't fit in.

It seems to me, as a four: Sixes have this more heady energy- a lot more anxious and keyed up. It's like you can hear the gears in their head turning. Or there's this sort of nervousness. They seem more either cynical or skeptical (typically 6w5) or trusting and lighter/fun (6w7). They seem more human to me, if that makes sense. Sixes may rebel for the sake of rebelling- for example, shaving their head and getting tattoos just to 'freak people out'. There are a lot more authority issues, or issues with belonging, or issues with deliberately setting themselves apart. Sixes are more loyal and supportive/ desire loyalty and support than fours. They tend to think out loud or tell their thoughts to others in order to process them- the 6w7s, anyway.

Fours have more of a heavy heart energy- this regretful moroseness. When I think of four I think of the first verse of a poem by Paul Verlaine- Il pleure dans mon coeur comme il pleut sur la ville/ Quelle est cette langueur qui penetre mon coeur- It cries in my heart like it rains on the city/ What is this languor which penetrates my heart?

Fours tend to be more sullen or despondent. This isn't to say a four can't have fun and can't be silly, but there's always this undercurrent that the fun silliness is fleeting. Fours are separated from others, but they don't do this deliberately. They just are. They may shave their head and get tattoos but it's more about expressing something within. Fours don't rebel so much as just have a different way of seeing things/ doing things. Others may perceive this as rebellion, but it's not. Fours are self absorbed- by this mean, every thing comes back into the self- how does this affect me? How does this make me feel? How does this relate to my past and me feelings of regret, shame, envy? Fours can also be supportive, but often drop people when the relationship 'feels wrong'. They have higher expectations and become frustrated more easily.
Yeah, that's true. When I mistyped at 6, I kept getting offended that my quirkiness had to be related to "rebellion". I don't "try" to be different or weird--I just am. People have noted this about me all my life, and while it can be very alienating and othering at times, it's also something I'd never want to sacrifice (and would probably literally unable to do so--the weird just comes out).

That's not to say I can't be rebellious--I am often contrary, especially when someone starts thinking they've got me all figured out. I am 6-fixed, though.

[MENTION=18664]Stansmith[/MENTION], sure sixes can be deep and morose. I don't know how to explain it well, but six depression is different than four depression. Sixes, when depressed or upset remind me more of a crying baby who won't stop crying until someone comes and picks them up, while fours do their crying internally hoping that someone will notice that they aren't crying out loud and come check on them to see why they aren't. Back asswards, I know.
Both 4s and 6s can get depressed for a variety of reasons; 4s tend to be more depressed about who they are (or aren't)--they tend to have some standard of they way they "want" to be, but fall perpertually short of that. There's also a sensitivity towards tragedy, suffering, and loss.

6s are superego types and perhaps get depressed when they've messed up according to the standards of their superego (I'd appreciate a core 6 filling me in on this one).

What if one prefers to not be seen at all crying?

Is it possible for ISFP's and/or enneagram 4's to become hardened and desensitized to overly emotional people?
I strongly prefer people not to see me cry. A big gripe of mine is precisely that 4 descriptions make us out to be these weepy, outwardly emotional things. I'm actually very guarded about that; I think my own family are the only people who've seen me cry, mainly only as a kid and teen.

I would, like, literally claim there was something in my eye rather than be seen crying at a movie theater, for instance. It doesn't mean I can't be moved internally, it just means I am extremely hesitant to show that to anyone.

I personally do not like over-emotional people myself. The thing is, I'm ingrown, and my own issues are all I can handle. I'm really not good at being a shoulder to cry on, and I don't like crybabies. So I'd say it's possible.

Crying for me is more often from a feeling of defeat. And in the last few years, my defeat usually stems from financial woes and stress.

I wonder if there are any threads on Enneagram 4 type movies vs Enneagram 6 type movies.
Again, yeah, inner sadness and suffering does not have to equate to crying.

As to the movies, I know I've seen a database for movies with Type X themes. Here it is; she categorizes each according to the main theme (not necessarily the types of the characters).

http://www.enneagramdimensions.net/articles\subtype_themes.pdf#start
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
[MENTION=18576]Sanjuro[/MENTION]

Both 4s and 6s can get depressed for a variety of reasons; 4s tend to be more depressed about who they are (or aren't)--they tend to have some standard of they way they "want" to be, but fall perpertually short of that. There's also a sensitivity towards tragedy, suffering, and loss.

6s are superego types and perhaps get depressed when they've messed up according to the standards of their superego (I'd appreciate a core 6 filling me in on this one).


Same reason. It's just that average Six issues will seem more typical and reparable (I can't fit in at school, I'm not cut out to be a lawyer, Im not a good dad, etc.), while Four is always philosophical and ego-gratifying. Sixes have to experience trauma or be in a deep existential crisis to get to that point, and even then, they won't enjoy it or cling to it for the sake of ego. Six depression is boring and numb.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
Depressed Four


Depressed Six




Four depression looks almost forced and self-serving, while Six is utterly burdensome. Depressed Sixes binge eat, purge, become anorexics, sleep all day, stare at ceilings, do lots of prescription drugs, succumb to alcoholism, barely shower, mumble when spoken to..Depressed Fours buy a new wardrobe, write poetry, shun their loved ones, manipulate or deceive people, and slit their wrists on rare occasions. Six goes through biological and physical death, Four goes through a dramatic, operatic death.
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Both 4s and 6s can get depressed for a variety of reasons; 4s tend to be more depressed about who they are (or aren't)--they tend to have some standard of they way they "want" to be, but fall perpertually short of that. There's also a sensitivity towards tragedy, suffering, and loss.

6s are superego types and perhaps get depressed when they've messed up according to the standards of their superego (I'd appreciate a core 6 filling me in on this one).

Yeah, same thing. 6 and 4 share the "should" thinking. For 6 a lot of it is gathered from external expectations and echoed in external roles. I feel worse about letting others down than letting myself down. My inner self is not that hard to please... she is more about having fun and enjoying things. My superego sense of what I "should" be is very hard to please and looks at me compared to other people and says I should be doing "better" than I am.
 

Galena

Silver and Lead
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
3,786
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
As to the movies, I know I've seen a database for movies with Type X themes. Here it is; she categorizes each according to the main theme (not necessarily the types of the characters).

http://www.enneagramdimensions.net/articles\subtype_themes.pdf#start
Going by that, I disproportionally like the 5 movies the most, with a couple 7, 4 and 8 themes sprinkled in. One thing that repeats in the type 4 themes is films about artists and the artistic process, which actually make me want to shove pointy things into my eyes and have ever since I was a kid (up to a rare limit: listed 4 movie Amadeus earned its awards). The irritation with stories about storytellers (films about director protagonists, [Author] on the Writing Life, songs about this dude who finds a guitar and changes the world, etc) extends over all mediums, and I can't explain it or defend it as fair. Maybe it comes off as self-romanticizing or -referential, they're airing something I feel is mega private, or maybe an inner preteen is just going "Nooo! It's not like that for me!"

I strongly prefer people not to see me cry. A big gripe of mine is precisely that 4 descriptions make us out to be these weepy, outwardly emotional things. I'm actually very guarded about that; I think my own family are the only people who've seen me cry, mainly only as a kid and teen.

I would, like, literally claim there was something in my eye rather than be seen crying at a movie theater, for instance. It doesn't mean I can't be moved internally, it just means I am extremely hesitant to show that to anyone.

I personally do not like over-emotional people myself. The thing is, I'm ingrown, and my own issues are all I can handle. I'm really not good at being a shoulder to cry on, and I don't like crybabies. So I'd say it's possible.
My opposite typing experience:

Descriptions were dead on all around, and I resisted the type for a little while some years ago (typed as 5 instead) because it made me remember things I didn't want to associate with and I wasn't ready to be called out so completely. Especially when I was younger, I have been wet-eyed and emotional and learned over time how to adapt with poise to a variety of situations (zoom to today where I get taken for a 3 sometimes); but have also been more patient with others' emotional spectrums and ready to extend validation. Better shoulder to cry on, at a price too high.

However, the thing that made me doubt my type later was reading posts from many 4's who seem to flaunt the written theories. I started going, "When I read about the strength of these people in overriding the issues, it brings up memories of times when I didn't keep my cool. I cannot be one of these people." Being an empirical person, I was drawn to trust my findings in the field more than the books and go back to the type drawing board. But when I did, I ignored the commonalities the exact same way with every other type. You probably saw because you helped: the process devolved mostly into exhaustively detailed logs of how I did not fit or live up to each type. :rolleyes:

The problem was selective memory. Not so empirical after all. Letting a few instances where I cried or went home sick from school color an entire life story is not fair and only represents one dimension. When I look at my old journals and stuff I wrote ten years ago, I see exactly why some people wanted to make me react: because I was also so goddamn severe toward them the whole rest of the time, and maybe they felt dismissed.

I hope that's on topic enough. It's one way to mistype, anyway.
 

Chad of the OttomanEmpire

Give me a fourth dot.
Joined
Jun 9, 2013
Messages
1,053
MBTI Type
NeTi
Enneagram
478
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
[MENTION=18576]Sanjuro[/MENTION]
Same reason. It's just that average Six issues will seem more typical and reparable (I can't fit in at school, I'm not cut out to be a lawyer, Im not a good dad, etc.), while Four is always philosophical and ego-gratifying. Sixes have to experience trauma or be in a deep existential crisis to get to that point, and even then, they won't enjoy it or cling to it for the sake of ego. Six depression is boring and numb.

Four depression looks almost forced and self-serving, while Six is utterly burdensome. Depressed Sixes binge eat, purge, become anorexics, sleep all day, stare at ceilings, do lots of prescription drugs, succumb to alcoholism, barely shower, mumble when spoken to..Depressed Fours buy a new wardrobe, write poetry, shun their loved ones, manipulate or deceive people, and slit their wrists on rare occasions. Six goes through biological and physical death, Four goes through a dramatic, operatic death.

I'm not sure you're being fair to either type here, though. Depression is depression--going through a depressed time is difficult for anyone, and clinical depression often winds up with a combination of any of the above symptoms, regardless of type.

Speaking only for myself, when I've been "depressed" (I haven't experienced clinical depression--just the downswings associated with 4), it really has been over those silly little issues you mentioned--"I don't fit in", "I'm ugly", "I suck at playing sports" whatever I think I should be. While I've philosophized about life and death to myself, I've seldom (if ever) gone on spirals about "Oh the futility that is existence...I shan't get out of bed today. Oh cursed emotion! Oh terrible night". Like you say, 4s ARE self-indulgent and self-centered, especially about the things that depress them. WE depress us. At least for me.

I think the most I've ever gotten to expressing my more depressed moments is to say, "Mom...my soul really hurts". (Expression includes art--I haven't tended to channel my feelings into anything productive). The drama may happen in my mind, but for the most part, being depressed and feeling like shit about myself...well, it just feels really bad, and that's not type specific.

I think the key we're looking for is, What sparks off the depression? (see below)

Yeah, same thing. 6 and 4 share the "should" thinking. For 6 a lot of it is gathered from external expectations and echoed in external roles. I feel worse about letting others down than letting myself down. My inner self is not that hard to please... she is more about having fun and enjoying things. My superego sense of what I "should" be is very hard to please and looks at me compared to other people and says I should be doing "better" than I am.

Same thing, different focus. Different reasons behind it.

I agree, 4s can be quite "super-egoy"--many shoulds and standards (or hopes and dreams) regarding the self. I guess it's an "internal should" (4) versus and "external should" (6).

Going by that, I disproportionally like the 5 movies the most, with a couple 7, 4 and 8 themes sprinkled in. One thing that repeats in the type 4 themes is films about artists and the artistic process, which actually make me want to shove pointy things into my eyes and have ever since I was a kid (up to a rare limit: listed 4 movie Amadeus earned its awards). The irritation with stories about storytellers (films about director protagonists, [Author] on the Writing Life, songs about this dude who finds a guitar and changes the world, etc) extends over all mediums, and I can't explain it or defend it as fair. Maybe it comes off as self-romanticizing or -referential, they're airing something I feel is mega private, or maybe an inner preteen is just going "Nooo! It's not like that for me!"
I kind of agree, actually. Most of the movies I liked on there are in the 7/8 range. I'm actually not big on the long, depressing dramas myself, and I don't always have patience for other people's "4 themes". It just might be for the reasons you said.
 
Last edited:
B

brainheart

Guest
Going by that, I disproportionally like the 5 movies the most, with a couple 7, 4 and 8 themes sprinkled in. One thing that repeats in the type 4 themes is films about artists and the artistic process, which actually make me want to shove pointy things into my eyes and have ever since I was a kid (up to a rare limit: listed 4 movie Amadeus earned its awards). The irritation with stories about storytellers (films about director protagonists, [Author] on the Writing Life, songs about this dude who finds a guitar and changes the world, etc) extends over all mediums, and I can't explain it or defend it as fair. Maybe it comes off as self-romanticizing or -referential, they're airing something I feel is mega private, or maybe an inner preteen is just going "Nooo! It's not like that for me!"


The idea of the list is to show the themes of the subtypes, not to list movies that the types would like. Do you relate to any of the themes of the subtypes for four?

Melancholia is another movie I'd list under the fours. I'd say it goes along with the theme that fours may experience difficulty with the mundane, but have great resilience in tragedy/ see tragedy as a means to transcend, and how they can use this ability to help others work through something dark or scary . I'm thinking especially of the end of the movie. (Not a theme listed precisely in the four subtypes, but it strikes me as a combination of sx and sp, with maybe a bit of the five influence.)
 

Standuble

New member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
1,149
This will probably be my only post on the subject but if you feel the need to critique I will take note accordingly. Apologies if there is a mix up on my part between the enneagram or their correlative MBTI types.

1) Fours don't need to try. A four can dress conservatively/plain/formal etc. and appear normal to the world in their appearance and how they come across to an immediate observer. However in the same vein as Godwin's Law (unfalsifiable) a four will inevitably be exposed as odd/strange/weird/unique/eccentric etc. even if they make zero effort to do so. It could take five seconds or five years but the impression that others hold about them will collapse. It's usually as soon as they open their mouths. They're just extra-terrestrial.

Sixes on the other hand are "relatively normal" and must apply effort to be unique. The benefit of this is that they are less likely to be considered an outsider or suffer ostracisation (basically have their cake and eat it.)

2) Fours have a better "internal measure" and sixes have a better "external measure". For example, fours know when they are not being themselves. They perceive any inauthenticity in their behaviour and any deviation from an inner identity. However they are sloppy when it comes to determining how normal or different they are being in relation to everybody else. It's easy for them to say "I'm unique!" or "damn, I'm just like everyone else" but these are conclusions derived from crude determinations and neither may be correct simply because there is no true standard (everyone is different etc.)

Sixes are the opposite, they are good at determining how far from the social norm they are operating. They can measure quite accurately what "socially normal behaviour" is and from that they can utilise the CP system or just be as rebellious as they choose. On the other hand the lack the four's sense of inner identity and have a harder time determining whether they are being themselves or someone else.
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Standuble said:
Sixes are the opposite, they are good at determining how far from the social norm they are operating. They can measure quite accurately what "socially normal behaviour" is and from that they can utilise the CP system or just be as rebellious as they choose. On the other hand the lack the four's sense of inner identity and have a harder time determining whether they are being themselves or someone else.

Yeah that's totally true. I think it even goes beyond determining whether you're being yourself or someone else to the 6 barely, if at all, having a sense of self that doesn't include other people's opinions. My superego sense of my parents' values is so, so deeply wound into my personality. I wouldn't want to extract them even if I could because I love and value my parents and want to preserve and carry forth (some of) their opinions. Of course there are some that I reject, though.

On the topic of uniqueness, I think it means something much more loaded and valuable to 4s than 6s.

Personally, I don't feel like I have to apply effort to be unique. I just honestly don't think about being unique. I figure that I am unique because I'm not everyone else and that's that. I do feel a satisfaction from being "special", but it has more to do with my intrinsic value being recognized in the outside world. Something akin to the phrase "coming into one's own". The ability to blossom forth your self-worth and have the universe reflect it back.

Just because it's an interesting contrast, my 9 says that he wants to be unique - though not strange - because he wants to demonstrate that he is not just a mold and has different things to offer than everyone else does. He says being unique is a good thing.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
How this relates to me:

This will probably be my only post on the subject but if you feel the need to critique I will take note accordingly. Apologies if there is a mix up on my part between the enneagram or their correlative MBTI types.

1) Fours don't need to try. A four can dress conservatively/plain/formal etc. and appear normal to the world in their appearance and how they come across to an immediate observer. However in the same vein as Godwin's Law (unfalsifiable) a four will inevitably be exposed as odd/strange/weird/unique/eccentric etc. even if they make zero effort to do so. It could take five seconds or five years but the impression that others hold about them will collapse. It's usually as soon as they open their mouths. They're just extra-terrestrial.

Sixes on the other hand are "relatively normal" and must apply effort to be unique. The benefit of this is that they are less likely to be considered an outsider or suffer ostracisation (basically have their cake and eat it.)

2) Fours have a better "internal measure" and sixes have a better "external measure". For example, fours know when they are not being themselves. They perceive any inauthenticity in their behaviour and any deviation from an inner identity. However they are sloppy when it comes to determining how normal or different they are being in relation to everybody else. It's easy for them to say "I'm unique!" or "damn, I'm just like everyone else" but these are conclusions derived from crude determinations and neither may be correct simply because there is no true standard (everyone is different etc.)

Sixes are the opposite, they are good at determining how far from the social norm they are operating. They can measure quite accurately what "socially normal behaviour" is and from that they can utilise the CP system or just be as rebellious as they choose. On the other hand the lack the four's sense of inner identity and have a harder time determining whether they are being themselves or someone else.
 

Standuble

New member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
1,149
How this relates to me:

Interesting. I was more concerned about MBTI/Enneagram blurring in the first point than the second as any N user could find themselves in such a position of being perceived as odd when they communicate abstractly or make intuitive leaps. I was making that point using a more specific conceptual mental image (which I attempted to articulate originally in this post but couldn't) which is more fine tuned. The second point was more integral to the distinction in my view though that too could be construed to be Ji vs Pi in the inner world.
 
Top