User Tag List

First 12

Results 11 to 20 of 20

  1. #11
    Senior Member Chloe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jixmixfix View Post
    you could use that same argument to debate MBTI, except make it 16.
    but 16 is waaaaaaaay bigger number than 9, i can easily see we can all fit in 16 boxes, but not 9.











  2. #12
    See Right Through Me Bubbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w3
    Socionics
    IEI
    Posts
    1,037

    Default

    Okay, hold on.

    9 types each have two wings. So 18 options of those, total. (Let's forget balanced wings for simplicity's sake.)
    Then we take into account variants. So 6 different sets x 18 = 108.
    Now if we take into account health levels, 9 levels x 108 = 972 total different types.

    Add in MBTI and we get 972 x 16 = 1552 different types.
    Add in socionics, we get 1552 x 16 = 248832 types.*

    What's the problem?

    *(Of course, this is hypothetical, and I'm sure not all 16 can be applicable when you are a certain MBTI type. It's usually quite similar to your type in socionics. But this is hypothetical.)
    4w3, IEI, so/sx/sp, female, and Cancer sign.

    My thoughts on...
    Enneagram:
    Socionics:
    MBTI:

    DISCLAIMER: If I offend you, I'm 99.9% sure it's unintentional. So be sure to let me know, m'kay? (And yes, an INFP would stick this in their signature, lol.)

  3. #13
    ^He pronks, too! Magic Poriferan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    Yin
    Enneagram
    One sx/sp
    Posts
    13,908

    Default

    I've felt the original Enneagram did have a way of leaving people out by getting too specific with the types, which I responded to with work on the substantial alteration of the Enneagram that me and Evan did.

    However, what has already been said here is correct. Your dispute is really applicable to all typological systems.
    Go to sleep, iguana.


    _________________________________
    INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.
    Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

  4. #14
    Senior Member The Outsider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    intp
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx
    Posts
    2,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    No offense, but I think only fools believe in the enneagram.
    ^
    That is beautiful.

  5. #15
    Feelin' FiNe speculative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Socionics
    LoL
    Posts
    929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    No offense, but I think only fools...
    Very well then, you contradict yourself. You must be large and contain multitudes...
    "How can I be, all I want to be,
    When all I want to do is strip away these stilled constraints
    And crush this charade, shred this sad, masquerade"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGeq5v7L3WM

  6. #16
    Senior Member iamathousandapples's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Enneagram
    5w6
    Socionics
    ILI
    Posts
    495

    Default

    To my knowledge, it's 162, including balanced wings and variants.

  7. #17
    Occasional Member Evan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    1
    Posts
    4,223

    Default

    This was one of my first thoughts on enneagram. It felt like the number nine was so arbitrary. With MBTI, 16 came from either four dichotomies (2^4 = 16) or eight possible dominant functions paired with two possible auxiliaries (8*2 = 16). Enneagram did not seem to be split up that way at all.

    But then I heard a bit about the groupings and realized that it was possible to create a framework (with help from MP) that broke the enneagram into constituent parts (3*3 = 9). That's really the only way I've been able to make sense of the system for myself (because if I can't make sense of it, I can't use it).

  8. #18
    Alexander the Terrible yenom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,755

    Default

    The more people you meet in life, the larger the sample size, and the more you realize the enneagram doesn't make sense. I am not anti enneagram per say, it does have some validations about human motivations.
    Like the type 5 and type 8 does have alot of traits I seem to have.
    But I also noticed there is a large number of people who doesn't fit in the 9 types.

    It is no more accurate than astrology, which I also semi-believe and like to study but not take it as a serious system about understanding other people.
    So overall I am ambivalent towards it.
    The fear of poverty turns people into slaves of money.

    "In this Caesar there are many Mariuses"~Sulla

    Conquer your inner demons first before you conquer the world.

  9. #19
    Occasional Member Evan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    1
    Posts
    4,223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    The more people you meet in life, the larger the sample size, and the more you realize the enneagram doesn't make sense. I am not anti enneagram per say, it does have some validations about human motivations.
    Like the type 5 and type 8 does have alot of traits I seem to have.
    But I also noticed there is a large number of people who doesn't fit in the 9 types.

    It is no more accurate than astrology, which I also semi-believe and like to study but not take it as a serious system about understanding other people.
    So overall I am ambivalent towards it.
    I don't see how it's not more accurate than astrology. You get to choose your best-fit type from a set of types with enneagram. There is no choice in astrology.

  10. #20
    mrs disregard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    INFP
    Posts
    7,855

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    No offense, but I think only fools believe in the enneagram. I met many people in this world who doesn't fit either one of the 9 enneagrams, nor could I believe that human nature can be categorized and generalized into 9 types. Human beings and their psychological development comes in all shapes and sizes? I look foward to other's opinion on this?
    I think it's foolish to identify with a type so much as to think that the type description is a blueprint of your personality, but it's generally enjoyable to identify with a group that shares something in common, and enneagram is one way to do that.

    For example.. I identify with type 1 because I wholly identify with the "1" type's dominant need to "reduce the disorder they see in their environment".

    There is nothing foolish about observing that I am much more inclined toward that than toward "[finding] out why things are the way they are" (type 5) or "[maintaining my] identity by seeing [myself] as fundamentally different from others" (type 4).

Similar Threads

  1. What is the purpose of human progress?
    By iwakar in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-30-2015, 11:08 PM
  2. Essence of Human nature
    By SolitaryWalker in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-16-2013, 11:10 PM
  3. Which style of management and view of human nature would you like to see prevail?
    By ygolo in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-23-2012, 03:13 PM
  4. [ENFJ] Is this more of an ENFJ or INFJ thing to do?
    By Lissa in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-29-2009, 09:22 PM
  5. [MBTItm] An Insight of Mine into the Mechanics of MBTI (feedback is welcome)
    By NashK in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 09:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO