4, but a lot of people who know me would guess 9 or maybe 5 if they knew about the Enneagram. What would fool them is that I look more serene than I really am, and that I also have a cerebral side. Both of those traits spring from my underlying Fourishness, though: the accommodating side because I'm too ashamed of myself to assert myself*; the cerebral side because intelligence is one of my few claims to specialness.
* Much more so in real life. Online, most of the reasons I feel defective are either invisible or easy to hide, and that allows me to assert myself whenever the need arises.
[ Ni > Ti > Fe > Fi > Ne > Te > Si > Se ][ 4w5 sp/sx ][ RLOAI ][ IEI-Ni ]
Enneagram vs. MBTI..which has more relevance in our psyches?
have no clue, but i read theory that mbti type is your "real self", and enneagram type defense mechanism.. so depending on your health level you either act more like enneagram type, or your true self - mbti.
sometimes mbti and ennea are similar, like enfp-7,
sometimes are complete opossites like infp-3.. so person is torned inside.
that's one theory, i have no opinion is it true, since i have no clue about enneagram.
That's a sign that you might be a 9. I basically tested 1 through 6. You have to read the in-depth descriptions to tell.
ETA: if the concept of wings being neighboring is as theoretical as how my tertiary cognitive process is supposed to be an S of some kind, then dang. 4 fits my second a lot better than 1 does. 9w4, then?