So, no to the knowing about coercing facts? Or yes, and it doesn't matter because truth is no longer the main concern? But whatever game this is, it's taken the place of the thread topic. Or this is how the thread topic, one day, is adequately determined?
And muddling the context this hard actually works in some way for something? The natural assumption would be you figure you've got it wrong. Or, you won because your arguments went mostly unanswered, like they were unanswerable, like winners arguments are?
Waaait, that's not how Ti works. There's always an argument under Ti. There's always some new objective invention of context or meaning you could try.
See, that's really very complex, and seems wildly unneccessary. Plato, as I recall, called it "the cloud of bullshit and therefore I pwnt". He was good with arguments.