|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
The elder Holmes
Join Date: Jun 2007
Type: INTJ
Posts: 847
![]() |
For God's sake, people, the word is spelled "definitely". D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y. There's no "a" in the word anywhere.
...Christ.
__________________
Dost thou love Life? Then do not squander Time; for that's the Stuff Life is made of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Fragmented Being
Join Date: Jul 2007
Type: InfJ
Location: C:\
Posts: 5,781
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Who, perchance, misspelled this word recently? And how could someone misspell such a simple word? It boggles the mind. Do people have no respect for the integrity of language? I often wonder if our descendants will even be able to read our language since people seem so content to allow drift. I think it's an awful state of affairs.
__________________
"I'm not much more than an interpreter, and not very good at telling stories. Well, not at making them interesting, anyways." --C3-P0, Star Wars IV: A New Hope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
The Doctor is IN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INtP
Location: Free at last.
Posts: 14,307
![]() |
Quote:
What does it mean to de-finite something anyhoo? That sounds like one would be making something LESS specific, not more defined. Sigh.Dykshunairees & staynderdqz? (Note: The "q" is always silent when preceding "z.") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||
|
Fragmented Being
Join Date: Jul 2007
Type: InfJ
Location: C:\
Posts: 5,781
![]() |
Quote:
in: not in + finire = not finishing, not ending. de: in this instance, is used as "out of, or derived from." It has other meanings, however. de + finire = completely finish, or derived from where it ends. That's just what I think from studying Latin, I'm not sure. Quote:
__________________
"I'm not much more than an interpreter, and not very good at telling stories. Well, not at making them interesting, anyways." --C3-P0, Star Wars IV: A New Hope |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Type: WOLF
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 285
![]() |
*amused by Jennifer*
I'm just saying that the first dictionary wasn't published before 1604 (120 pages, Robert Cawdray) and the first real dictionary was Johnson's, from 1755 and during the 1700s the aristocracy would spell as they talked, with results such as sartinly (certainly), byled (boiled) and gine (join), if you are to believe McCrum et al - the story of English. Damn - I hate getting interrupted all the time. Get me away from this hellhole they call work! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is heritage important to you? | Metamorphosis | The Bonfire | 18 | 09-27-2007 05:23 PM |
| A Note on the Problem of Induction | reason | Philosophy and Spirituality | 3 | 09-19-2007 01:47 PM |