• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

forum chess game

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
My knight is on c6, otherwise everything seems correct. I love the position!

Fixed. It's actually getting tedious to generate the position at this point.

It's funny, I am not really sure why you evaluate it so well for black.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
Didn't think you were a "talker" Splittet.

But it can make things more interesting for spectators :D

I still have the g4 and f5 attack comming. Wait for it.
 

Nadir

Enigma
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
544
MBTI Type
INxJ
Enneagram
4
I'm watching you guys, as is another chess enthusiast.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
I thought I was the p-type :D

What's going on in your head?

I was expecting more tactics from an INTJ :D. So far only two pawns have been taken.

It is your move is it not?
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
You know, I am using Rybka here... That is allowed, right? I am simply analysing an ocean of lines. The position is so complicated it takes time...
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
Rybka is a chess engine.

That makes me feel better. I am not using any engine, and haven't gotten demolished.

I am trying to create a pre-concieved position with my pieces, that is why I thought we were still in book. There hasn't been anything forcefully different from what I wanted.
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8
 

Nadir

Enigma
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
544
MBTI Type
INxJ
Enneagram
4
Doesn't it sort of defeat the purpose when one side uses a chess engine to analyse? It's not like you're going to deviate much from the lines it's going to show you, and the machine will make sure the lines themselves are okay, given that the other side is human, and not a grandmaster at that.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8

(Here it comes...)
16. g4

Doesn't it sort of defeat the purpose when one side uses a chess engine to analyse? It's not like you're going to deviate much from the lines it's going to show you, and the machine will make sure the lines themselves are okay, given that the other side is human, and not a grandmaster at that.

I beat a lot of the chess engines out there.

We'll see how good this Rybka thing is.
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
I thought this was supposed to be correspondence chess, and in correspondence chess using chess engines is allowed. Everyone actually kind of does. This position is so complex it matters a lot how you use the engine, it might actually be I underestimated his whole kingside attack. Generally engines underestimate king attacks.
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8
16. g4 Bb7
 

Nadir

Enigma
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
544
MBTI Type
INxJ
Enneagram
4
I thought this was supposed to be correspondence chess, and in correspondence chess using chess engines is allowed. Everyone actually kind of does. This position is so complex it matters a lot how you use the engine, it might actually be I underestimated his whole kingside attack. Generally engines underestimate king attacks.

Well, you're right, it's allowed in correspondence chess, but both sides use it. I just thought -- although ygolo seems confident enough! :) -- that just one side using it might create a disadvantage. Not that it matters what with the amount of moves already played -- but might be something to keep in mind for the inevitable next game.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8
16. g4 Bb7
17. Qe1

The queen joins the fray, showing why I did 15. Rc1.

5wgvtgbpatwc.png


(here is what I believe the position is now)

Also, Splittet, comentary is illustrative, so you should still try to understand what the engine is feeding you.
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8
16. g4 Bb7
17. Qe1 Ra2
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
5,996
1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 Nc6
3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7
5. d3 d6
6. f4 Rb8
7. Nf3 Nf6
8. 0-0 0-0
9. h3 b5
10. a3 a5
11. Be3 b4
12. axb4 axb4
13. Ne2 Qc7
14. b3 e6
15. Rc1 Ra8
16. g4 Bb7
17. Qe1 Ra2

18. f5

There it is. But I may need to sacrfice some things to make this attack work.

This will get scary.

6nih2k31d2ww.png
 
Top