I'd say significantly above average. While I think she's easily more attractive than the other celebrities mentioned in the thread, that's not really the point. When compared to the general population, it's hard to think she wouldn't be more attractive than 8 of 10 random people pulled off the street. Next time you go outside, pay attention to the first ten people you see.
yeah, but you live in the US, right? lots of uglies there.
Exactly. The disparity of "beauty resources" is disrupting the playing field.
I'd bet money that if either of us had the same army of people dedicated to maintaining our peak physical appearance, we would blow that broad out of the water. Conversely, if she had a regular beauty routine like us, we'd still blow her out of the water.
She's just a'ight, but if her face contorts into an expression outside of her Top 3 Safe Red Carpet Smiles, it morphs horrifically illustrating her unflattering physiognomy:
that's the firefly girl, right? If yes, I'm amazed at how much worse she looks with blonde hair.
She's still well above the general population (well....after airbrushing etc, so who knows really), but probably average to below average as a celebrity, in blonde anyway. She looks better when she doesn't appear to have makeup on. Maybe above average in brunette, if we're being generous about the definition of "celebrity" for averages.