Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocapszy
If it takes the interest of Ni, then the Ni user will do exactly what Ne does. The IN_J will wonder "why would I jump out of a building?" where EN_P says "why would he do that?"
|
I was just gonna say something similar, but you said it better than I would've so yeah, I agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by athenian200
If I didn't know better, I'd swear you had a very high opinion of Ti... almost like you want to worship/serve it or something.
|
We all know he worships at the Ti altar, but I think what he was trying to say was that a very active dominant function won't achieve balance without developing the auxiliary to act as a 'brake', and since it's ENTP he's talking about, obviously it's going to be Ti acting as a complement to Ne. I'm sure if he'd been talking about ENFP, he'd have said that development and use of Fi is just as crucial. Correct me if I'm wrong BW.
I think you put a lot of work into it BW, and it has actually been quite helpful to me (esp. the part I quoted earlier) today. Thank you for taking the time
