View Single Post
Old 10-01-2008, 09:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
ptgatsby
Senior Member
 
ptgatsby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: ISTP
Location: Vancouver, BC, CA
Posts: 4,091
ptgatsby has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolla View Post
I guess it's mostly about which of the trends is more popular. Other than that, some research show that a type of women prefer non-dominant males. This is explained through the parenting role of father. The dominant male doesn't have a whole lot of time to take care of the puppies since he's out there spreading seed...
Excellent point - that's pretty much it.

A child's chance of survival and ability to have children can be well supported by good genes, lots of resources, dedicated parents... And it can be hurt by the lack of all of those two. So, in the end, males get to try a few different ways of doing things, and women are influenced in different ways.


Quote:
I can imagine very dramatic scenes in a stone-age tribe of 10 males and 10 females... The dominant male can't watch over the harem all the time. There probably was a lot of the "mixed strategy".
Then you have the huge harems held by those that are rich, etc. And the Kahn types, which make up measurable % of males in an area (and the world - I think 0.5% of men are his descendents!)

And the methods change. Young males, for example, are attention seekers. Physically competing over females, for example. But older males tend to use status and wealth, instead. Women can mate with either and have the same level of success, roughly, but men can't use both strategies at the same time, unless they are at the very top of each strategy.

(As you can tell, I love this subject Sorry for the rambling)
ptgatsby is offline   Reply With Quote