I believe I do fail to understand what you're getting at. I'll read the thread again, if you want to clarify feel free.
After reading the thread:
1. It seems some of you are agreeing that a specific line of inductive reasoning is actually deductive reasoning, which stumps me.
2. It seems the knowledge you seek is something outside the bounds of logical analysis, so I naturally have little interest. We're coming at it from very different perspectives. I see it as a very simple issue. "No, you can't really trust it. The end."
|