[Colors]

Originally Posted by Xander

Odd.. I'd have placed Bones as an ISTJ due to her rarely being conceptual and mostly basing things on "facts" and what can be observed more than what can be extrapolated from the general evidence.

But it seems to come from an idealistic place. A strict scientific value in evidence only and *not* from "reading" or "reinterpreting" the contexts (aka, not internal percieving). Plus she has no regard for traditions, except those she's studied to have logical benefit.

Originally Posted by ygolo

Each NT has their own approach, and that approach is usually well ingrained and improved upon. That is hard for me to explain. I rely on my math-team experience, and match-up with old team-mates styles. INTJs and ENTPs have rather distinct styles from each other. INTJs like to look for some deep symbolic "meaning" to the problem they are solving (and are amazingly sucessful at finding it). I call it "inside-out" problem solving. ENTPs, on the other hand, seem to just blow through problems as if they were composed of a series of trivial sub-problems, and a few sticky points that require "break-throughs" by having "epiphanies." I call this "outside-in" problem solving. Brenan really seems outside-in.

Really convincing post .

A frequent conflict seems to be Booth process jumping to conclusions vs. Bones holding back... The lab squints in general have a very P (Ne) approach to solving the mysteries, you're right.