Quote:
Originally Posted by edcoaching
There are whole books out there that help you decide which division to use, depending on the purpose (The MBTI Teambuilding Program by the Hirshes is excellent)].
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edcoaching
one chooses the grouping based on purpose AND on who is in the group.
|
That's a novel idea. Perhaps it would indeed be useful to learn the dynamics of each of the divisions! I hadn't thought it that far. Thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by edcoaching
Quadrants (IS, IN, EN, ES): learning styles, change
Function pairs (ST, SF, NF, NT): communication, careers
Temperaments (SJ, SP, NF, NT): leadership, work styles
Dominant functions: problem solving, influencing, communication, spirituality
Last two letters (TJ, TP, FJ, FP): conflict resolution
Attitude/orientation (IJ, IP, EJ, EP): work styles
edcoaching, INFJ
|
The bolded seem most recognizable to me. I can see how bulk of the workforce in many industries seem to be divided with the grouping ST, SF, NF, NT.
Well, actually almost all of them seem well labeled. Of course, the styles overlap a bit, but that's a useful categorization. Thanks.
What do you mean by conflict resolution? This grouping seems like one of the most used "team role" division I've seen. Impersonally directive, impersonally informational, personally directive and personally informational, or something to that effect.
How would you describe the different conflict resolution styles with the TJ, TP, FJ and FP?