Ah - thank you, dissonance.
These are very helpful links.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan
I feel that we have to completely re-think these conventions. I no longer feel that there is any reason to doubt the validity of a so-called 5w8. Your primary behavior is to be passive/evasive, but next to that , you prefer Active/Aggressive. Similarly, your primary value of feeling is to be Detached, but that secondarily gives way to being Temperamental.
So, 5, then 8. That's my assumption anyway. This can't be known for sure until a test was designed uniquely for this theory. My over all point is that you shouldn't feel restricted to focusing on Six or Four. I'm currently working out some theories regarding relations to auxilliary type and supporting type models, but their still in the oven, I'm afraid.
|
Thank you, Magic.
My hesitation to simply accept 6 over 8 was to preserve accuracy - a point well defined in your post.
The 5w8 is significantly closer to my approximate behavior than the 5w6; 5w3 (my next closest scores...).