Thread: Ne and science
View Single Post
Old 03-27-2008, 10:54 PM   #32 (permalink)
Maverick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: ENTJ
Posts: 887
Maverick is unique just like everyone else
Default

I have always had the same frustration with science. I'm interested in the overall model and theory. I couldn't care less about the details. I also find it frustrating not seeing the direct application of things.

Considering the use of Ne, it depends on the level you're at. As an undergrad, it's just too much of a slow, painstaking and detailed process IMO. You hyper-specialize and work on very precise questions. You change a couple of variables at a time. Once you finally get results, you have the tedious job of writing something up that will be accepted by a journal. Then it's nitpicking and you constantly fight with reviewers over details. Boring as hell if you ask me. It is very Si, Ti and Fe. The Ne part is relatively minor compared to the rest of the job.

I think that professors get to use Ne more.They can focus on the conceptual part of things and work on several projects, supervising several grad students.
Maverick is offline   Reply With Quote